From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755555AbYIKQnn (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2008 12:43:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752120AbYIKQne (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2008 12:43:34 -0400 Received: from outbound-mail-134.bluehost.com ([67.222.39.24]:55193 "HELO outbound-mail-134.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751986AbYIKQne (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2008 12:43:34 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=virtuousgeek.org; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id:X-Identified-User; b=BHq8cDMNfspZWaqk0lvizq4jEhqJEO9lv41LcMBGpBje2ZRA8ivdnlbkE1CFhiFm+bprQ8OFbRYhUvB3qF+3rAMmhXFF8bg5vr9MAoSJcJ/bG6WrTjuz72OvgSVxWwnA; From: Jesse Barnes To: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: fix merging left out for BAR print out v2 Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 09:43:20 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Yinghai Lu , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz References: <1220988472-24139-1-git-send-email-yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> <200809101123.46618.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> <20080911075623.GA5500@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20080911075623.GA5500@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200809110943.20596.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> X-Identified-User: {642:box128.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 75.111.27.49 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, September 11, 2008 12:56 am Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Ah I see, sure I can pull your bits. /me gets out his breadcrumbs in > > preparation for entering the x86 forest. Does your -tip just contain > > stuff you're sending to Linus for 2.6.27? > > no, the .27 buckets of -tip are almost completely emptied - we are in > the final stages of .27 stabilization. -tip includes all the v2.6.28 > bits. (which this patch would be too IMHO) > > anyway, there's no big issue here i think, upstream -git is fine i > think, please apply the patch to your tree (it only changes printouts), > it should not cause any big conflicts. I was thinking it would be good to have this in 2.6.27 since it's a regression vs. earlier kernels. Anyway I'll apply the patch and let git sort out the duplication. Thanks, -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center