From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: mingo@elte.hu, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de, arjan@linux.intel.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Subject: [patch 5/7] x86, cpa: fix taking the pgd_lock with interrupts off
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:30:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080911204151.010960000@linux-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20080911203048.929515000@linux-os.sc.intel.com
[-- Attachment #1: fix_pageattr_irqlock.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2933 bytes --]
Interrupt context no longer does the large page split, so no need to use
spin_lock_irqsave()
Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
---
Index: tip/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c 2008-09-11 13:19:54.000000000 -0700
+++ tip/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c 2008-09-11 13:25:53.000000000 -0700
@@ -43,12 +43,10 @@
void update_page_count(int level, unsigned long pages)
{
- unsigned long flags;
-
/* Protect against CPA */
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pgd_lock, flags);
+ spin_lock(&pgd_lock);
direct_pages_count[level] += pages;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgd_lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock(&pgd_lock);
}
static void split_page_count(int level)
@@ -338,7 +336,7 @@
try_preserve_large_page(pte_t *kpte, unsigned long address,
struct cpa_data *cpa)
{
- unsigned long nextpage_addr, numpages, pmask, psize, flags, addr, pfn;
+ unsigned long nextpage_addr, numpages, pmask, psize, addr, pfn;
pte_t new_pte, old_pte, *tmp;
pgprot_t old_prot, new_prot;
int i, do_split = 1;
@@ -347,7 +345,7 @@
if (cpa->force_split)
return 1;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pgd_lock, flags);
+ spin_lock(&pgd_lock);
/*
* Check for races, another CPU might have split this page
* up already:
@@ -442,7 +440,7 @@
}
out_unlock:
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgd_lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock(&pgd_lock);
return do_split;
}
@@ -454,7 +452,6 @@
static void cpa_fill_pool(struct page **ret)
{
gfp_t gfp = GFP_KERNEL;
- unsigned long flags;
struct page *p;
/*
@@ -484,10 +481,10 @@
*ret = p;
continue;
}
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pgd_lock, flags);
+ spin_lock(&pgd_lock);
list_add(&p->lru, &page_pool);
pool_pages++;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgd_lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock(&pgd_lock);
}
current->flags &= ~PF_MEMALLOC;
@@ -527,7 +524,7 @@
static int split_large_page(pte_t *kpte, unsigned long address)
{
- unsigned long flags, pfn, pfninc = 1;
+ unsigned long pfn, pfninc = 1;
unsigned int i, level;
pte_t *pbase, *tmp;
pgprot_t ref_prot;
@@ -538,14 +535,14 @@
* pgd_lock, which we have to take anyway for the split
* operation:
*/
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pgd_lock, flags);
+ spin_lock(&pgd_lock);
if (list_empty(&page_pool)) {
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgd_lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock(&pgd_lock);
base = NULL;
cpa_fill_pool(&base);
if (!base)
return -ENOMEM;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pgd_lock, flags);
+ spin_lock(&pgd_lock);
} else {
base = list_first_entry(&page_pool, struct page, lru);
list_del(&base->lru);
@@ -616,7 +613,7 @@
pool_pages++;
} else
pool_used++;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgd_lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock(&pgd_lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -676,6 +673,10 @@
return 0;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
+ BUG_ON(irqs_disabled());
+#endif
+
/*
* Check, whether we can keep the large page intact
* and just change the pte:
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-11 21:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-11 20:30 [patch 0/7] x86, cpa: cpa related changes to be inline with TLB Application note Suresh Siddha
2008-09-11 20:30 ` [patch 1/7] x86, cpa: rename PTE attribute macros for kernel direct mapping in early boot Suresh Siddha
2008-09-11 20:30 ` [patch 2/7] x86, cpa: remove USER permission from the very early identity mapping attribute Suresh Siddha
2008-09-11 20:30 ` [patch 3/7] x86, cpa: make the kernel physical mapping initialization a two pass sequence Suresh Siddha
2008-09-11 20:30 ` [patch 4/7] x86, cpa: dont use large pages for kernel identity mapping with DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Suresh Siddha
2008-09-11 20:30 ` Suresh Siddha [this message]
2008-09-11 20:30 ` [patch 6/7] x86, cpa: remove cpa pool code Suresh Siddha
2008-09-11 20:30 ` [patch 7/7] x86, cpa: global flush tlb after splitting large page and before doing cpa Suresh Siddha
2008-09-13 17:10 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-14 15:29 ` [patch 0/7] x86, cpa: cpa related changes to be inline with TLB Application note Ingo Molnar
2008-09-14 16:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-16 5:44 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-09-14 15:40 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-14 15:52 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080911204151.010960000@linux-os.sc.intel.com \
--to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox