public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dean Nelson <dcn@sgi.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Alan Mayer <ajm@sgi.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	jeremy@goop.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
	suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.lu@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] dynamically allocate arch specific system vectors
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 06:46:38 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080912114638.GA2661@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48C979D3.5000308@zytor.com>

On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 01:04:35PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Dean Nelson wrote:
> >
> >We (SGI) need somewhere around eight vectors.
> >
> >There are two kernel modules, sgi-gru and sgi-xp (in drivers/misc), that
> >each need two vectors. And there's the broadcast assist unit (BAU) that is
> >involved in tlb shootdown on uv, which currently uses statically reserved
> >vector 0xf8 (UV_BAU_MESSAGE -- see uv_bau_init()). I know of a debugger 
> >that
> >also uses 0xf8 because it was previously available until UV_BAU_MESSAGE 
> >came
> >along. The BAU would be happy with a dynamically allocated system vector.
> >We have a couple of other things in the works that also need vectors.
> >
> >All of these eight or so vectors are only meaningful on SGI uv systems.
> >
> 
> Are these kernel-internal vectors, or exposed to userspace (i.e. the INT 
> instruction works in userspace)?  From what I'm gathering, I think this 
> is the former.

Yeah, these are kernel-internal vectors and are not exposed to userspace.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-12 11:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-08 15:37 [Fwd: [PATCH] x86_64: (NEW) Dynamically allocate arch specific system vectors] Alan Mayer
2008-08-11 16:59 ` [PATCH] x86_64: (NEW) Dynamically allocate arch specific system vectors Ingo Molnar
2008-08-11 17:14   ` Alan Mayer
2008-08-11 19:39     ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-08-11 19:51       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-11 19:55         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-11 20:10         ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-08-11 20:02       ` Alan Mayer
2008-09-11 15:23       ` [RFC 0/4] dynamically " Dean Nelson
2008-09-11 15:25         ` [RFC 1/4] switch vector_irq[] from irq number to irq_desc pointer Dean Nelson
2008-09-11 15:27         ` [RFC 2/4] introduce dynamically allocated system vectors Dean Nelson
2008-09-14 15:39           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-14 15:46           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-11 15:28         ` [RFC 3/4] switch static system vector allocation to use vector_irq[] Dean Nelson
2008-09-11 15:29         ` [RFC 4/4] switch non-standard SYSCALL_VECTOR " Dean Nelson
2008-09-14 15:40           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-14 15:42           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-11 20:04         ` [RFC 0/4] dynamically allocate arch specific system vectors H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-12 11:46           ` Dean Nelson [this message]
2008-09-14 15:35         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-14 15:48           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-15 21:50           ` Dean Nelson
2008-09-16  8:24             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-16 20:46               ` Dean Nelson
2008-09-17 17:30                 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2008-09-17 18:59                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-09-18 13:37                     ` Dean Nelson
2008-09-18 19:18                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-17 19:15                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-17 20:21                   ` Jack Steiner
2008-09-17 22:15                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-09-18  1:09                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-18 19:10                       ` Jack Steiner
2008-09-19  0:28                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-09-19  8:48                           ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080912114638.GA2661@sgi.com \
    --to=dcn@sgi.com \
    --cc=Yinghai.lu@amd.com \
    --cc=ajm@sgi.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox