From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757760AbYILUSx (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:18:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753124AbYILUSp (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:18:45 -0400 Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.170.185]:40649 "EHLO rn-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755395AbYILUSo (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:18:44 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=i27vtzbsRmhI2oQtkXmw3akuuSsmCNDLMSn8Uyj2WJ4ssJcORWdxz3zVrqQZ/waK7N lI4Vq4CoTch6Zklh2mFOT2ot+qKGv0oEkWIQ/MEsX6MKxlR8iH0LccXhcI485SPBqEgO lkiKZ7Ubhjc0aFdkLdLqUpuZtKl85+eCt2MUw= Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 00:18:48 +0400 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Ingo Molnar , LKML , "Maciej W. Rozycki" Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: io-apic - do not use KERN_DEBUG marker too much Message-ID: <20080912201848.GB8410@lenovo> References: <20080908153806.GB7278@lenovo> <86802c440809121255k1af2881dwb00ebb6f4a58057b@mail.gmail.com> <86802c440809121257s23e5193aqb7939fdc94473c9d@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86802c440809121257s23e5193aqb7939fdc94473c9d@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [Yinghai Lu - Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 12:57:21PM -0700] ... | > IOAPIC[0]: Set routing entry (8-14 -> 0x3e -> IRQ 14 Mode:0 Active:0) | > 0 add_pin_to_irq: irq 15 --> apic 0 pin 15 | > IOAPIC[0]: Set routing entry (8-15 -> 0x3f -> IRQ 15 Mode:0 Active:0) | > 8-16 8-17 8-18 8-19 8-20 8-21 8-22 8-23 (apicid-pin) not connected | > 9-0 9-1 9-2 9-3 9-4 9-5 9-6 9-7 9-8 9-9 9-10 9-11 9-12 9-13 9-14 9-15 | > 9-16 9-17 9-18 9-19 9-20 9-21 9-22 9-23 (apicid-pin) not connected | > | | only first one not connected at first, and ... | | why not just revert those two patches? | | YH | ok, convinced - Ingo, could you drop them please? (yes, I've missed one new-line printing, sorry - but quite frankly - it reveals another problem - printing between other printing - which means ideally it would be to _have_ temporary buffer apart from printk buffer. So we have - either adding additional new line printout 'cause of printing inbetween or our own buffer to be able to print in nice-fasion. Anyway I'm fine to just revert these attempts made. And thanks Yinghai for comments and testing!) - Cyrill -