From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755186AbYINQZh (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Sep 2008 12:25:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752896AbYINQZ2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Sep 2008 12:25:28 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:43601 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752280AbYINQZ1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Sep 2008 12:25:27 -0400 Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:25:14 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Jordan Crouse Cc: Andreas Herrmann , Yinghai Lu , Rufus & Azrael , Linux-kernel Mailing List , David Witbrodt Subject: Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found another user with the same regression Message-ID: <20080914162514.GD22385@elte.hu> References: <86802c440808231310hdafc30aw6931b77ea926338e@mail.gmail.com> <48B06FF9.1030404@numericable.fr> <86802c440808231328w5c6a3fa3s9be9d90ec1f30aa1@mail.gmail.com> <48B07409.60905@numericable.fr> <86802c440808231335n9214e38q5141a3560c698f76@mail.gmail.com> <48B074E1.9020106@numericable.fr> <86802c440808231345u7c4f7710k5878928239507b10@mail.gmail.com> <86802c440808231405u42fa8024r89eccc907f36d99e@mail.gmail.com> <20080912173933.GF6743@alberich.amd.com> <20080912174522.GB8042@cosmic.amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080912174522.GB8042@cosmic.amd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Jordan Crouse wrote: > On 12/09/08 19:39 +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 02:05:19PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > > Jordan, or others for AMD could access SB600 > > > can you check ATI SB600 doc to produce one quirks patch to set the > > > magic bit to hide 00:14.0 BAR1 to OS ? > > > > I know this is a very late reply, but > > is there still a quirk desired to hide BAR1 of SB600 SMBus device? > > > > If yes, I'll provide a patch asap. > > I sent one up last week, but it was overshadowed by the much > more serious R790 problem that Linus and Rafael was looking > at. I have re-attached the patch for posterity. i think that quirk still makes sense (even with a perfect PCI resources engine it gets rid of a debug warning), i've applied it to tip/timers/hpet. Thanks Jordan, Ingo