public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>
To: Oren Laadan <orenl@cs.columbia.edu>
Cc: dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	jeremy@goop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de
Subject: Re: [RFC v5][PATCH 7/8] Infrastructure for shared objects
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 17:09:12 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080916220912.GA21663@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48D026ED.3080109@cs.columbia.edu>

Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl@cs.columbia.edu):
> 
> 
> Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl@cs.columbia.edu):
> >> Infrastructure to handle objects that may be shared and referenced by
> >> multiple tasks or other objects, e..g open files, memory address space
> >> etc.
> >>
> >> The state of shared objects is saved once. On the first encounter, the
> >> state is dumped and the object is assigned a unique identifier (objref)
> >> and also stored in a hash table (indexed by its physical kenrel address).
> >> >From then on the object will be found in the hash and only its identifier
> >> is saved.
> >>
> >> On restart the identifier is looked up in the hash table; if not found
> >> then the state is read, the object is created, and added to the hash
> >> table (this time indexed by its identifier). Otherwise, the object in
> >> the hash table is used.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Oren Laadan <orenl@cs.columbia.edu>
> > 
> > Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
> > 
> > Thanks, Oren, I actually think this is quite nice and readable.
> > 
> > Though three questions below.  First one is, since you've mentioned
> > having multiple threads doing checkpoint, won't you need some locking?
> 
> yes.
> 
> > I assume that's coming in later patches if/when needed?
> 
> yes.
> 
> [...]
> 
> >> +++ b/checkpoint/objhash.c
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,237 @@
> >> +/*
> >> + *  Checkpoint-restart - object hash infrastructure to manage shared objects
> >> + *
> >> + *  Copyright (C) 2008 Oren Laadan
> >> + *
> >> + *  This file is subject to the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public
> >> + *  License.  See the file COPYING in the main directory of the Linux
> >> + *  distribution for more details.
> >> + */
> >> +
> >> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> >> +#include <linux/file.h>
> >> +#include <linux/hash.h>
> >> +#include <linux/checkpoint.h>
> >> +
> >> +struct cr_objref {
> >> +	int objref;
> >> +	void *ptr;
> >> +	unsigned short type;
> > 
> > What is the point of the 'type'?
> > 
> > By that I mean: is it meant to catch bugs in the implementation, or bad
> > checkpoint images?
> 

...

> There are different functions to inc/dec the reference count of objects
> of different types. '->type' keeps track of the type of the object, so
> we know which function to call. (At this point, we only track shared
> 'struct file' so it isn't that clear from the code).

Doh, right.

> 
> > 
> >> +	unsigned short flags;
> >> +	struct hlist_node hash;
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +struct cr_objhash {
> >> +	struct hlist_head *head;
> >> +	int objref_index;
> > 
> > What exactly will objref_index be used for?  I don't see any real
> > usage here or in your later patches.
> > 
> 
> 'objref_index' is a counter used to assign unique identifiers (objref)
> to objects as they are added to the hash table. It is incremented with
> every object that joins the hash table (and the old value is used as
> the objref of that object). It is used in cr_obj_new().

If you were to rename objref_index to next_free_ref, I think that'd
be helpful.  (I also don't think 'obj' should in the name at all, and
you should just s/objref/id/, but that's really too much pain)

thanks,
-serge

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-16 22:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-13 23:05 [RFC v5][PATCH 0/9] Kernel based checkpoint/restart Oren Laadan
2008-09-13 23:05 ` [RFC v5][PATCH 1/8] Create syscalls: sys_checkpoint, sys_restart Oren Laadan
2008-09-15 20:28   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-09-13 23:06 ` [RFC v5][PATCH 2/8] General infrastructure for checkpoint restart Oren Laadan
2008-09-15 17:54   ` Dave Hansen
2008-09-15 17:59   ` Dave Hansen
2008-09-15 18:00   ` Dave Hansen
2008-09-15 18:02   ` Dave Hansen
2008-09-15 18:52     ` Oren Laadan
2008-09-15 19:13       ` Dave Hansen
2008-09-16 12:27     ` Bastian Blank
2008-09-15 21:15   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-09-13 23:06 ` [RFC v5][PATCH 3/8] x86 support for checkpoint/restart Oren Laadan
2008-09-15 21:31   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-09-13 23:06 ` [RFC v5][PATCH 4/8] Dump memory address space Oren Laadan
2008-09-17  6:48   ` MinChan Kim
2008-09-13 23:06 ` [RFC v5][PATCH 5/8] Restore " Oren Laadan
2008-09-15 19:14   ` Dave Hansen
2008-09-13 23:06 ` [RFC v5][PATCH 6/8] Checkpoint/restart: initial documentation Oren Laadan
2008-09-15 20:26   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-09-17  6:23   ` MinChan Kim
2008-09-13 23:06 ` [RFC v5][PATCH 7/8] Infrastructure for shared objects Oren Laadan
2008-09-16 16:48   ` Dave Hansen
2008-09-17  7:31     ` MinChan Kim
2008-09-16 20:54   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-09-16 21:36     ` Oren Laadan
2008-09-16 22:09       ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
2008-09-13 23:06 ` [RFC v5][PATCH 8/8] Dump open file descriptors Oren Laadan
2008-09-14  9:51   ` Bastian Blank
2008-09-14 15:40     ` Oren Laadan
2008-09-16 23:03       ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-09-22 15:31         ` Dave Hansen
2008-09-16 15:54   ` Dave Hansen
2008-09-16 16:55   ` Dave Hansen
2008-09-13 23:06 ` [RFC v5][PATCH 9/9] Restore open file descriprtors Oren Laadan
2008-09-16 23:08   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-09-17  0:11     ` Oren Laadan
2008-09-17  4:56       ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-09-22 16:02       ` Dave Hansen
2008-09-13 23:22 ` Oren Laadan
2008-09-17 14:16 ` [RFC v5][PATCH 0/9] Kernel based checkpoint/restart Serge E. Hallyn
2008-10-08  9:59   ` Oren Laadan
2008-09-24 21:42 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-09-25 12:58   ` Cedric Le Goater

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080916220912.GA21663@us.ibm.com \
    --to=serue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=orenl@cs.columbia.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox