public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] loglevel=pci:8,acpi:8,apic=8 support v5
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 10:47:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080917084754.GC24035@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080917073058.GA3770@x200.localdomain>


* Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:10:09AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >     KERN_PCI
> >     KERN_ACPI
> > v4: fix some checkpatch error and warning
> > v5: add default with DEFINE_LOGLEVE_SETUP_DEF
> >     KERN_APIC
> > 
> > usage:
> > 	in .h to have
> > 		#define KERN_PCI "<pci>"
> > 	in .c to have
> > 		DEFINE_LOGLEVEL_SETUP(pci, KERN_PCI, "pci:");
> > 	then could use
> > 		printk(KERN_DEBUG KERN_PCI fmt, ...);
> > 	and command line
> > 		loglevel=3,pci:8
> > 
> > you can add different printk to different files of one subsys if you like
> > not just one susbsys one tag, and don't need to update kernel.h to add more tags
> 
> I think all of this is overdesigned and stupid.
> 
> People expecting that loglevels are exactly right so they can calm 
> messages are like security-savvy people who expect all security 
> relevant bugfixes carry CVE tag.
> 
> grep says there are 50757 printk calls, only 32129 of them carry KERN_ 
> tag.
>
> Oh, and new and improved logs:
> 
> 	[    0.340326] pci 0000:00:01.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> 	[    0.340326] pci 0000:00:01.0: PME# disabled
> 	[    0.340326] <pci>PCI: 0000:00:1a.0 reg 20 io port: [dc00, dc1f]
> 	[    0.340413] <pci>PCI: 0000:00:1a.1 reg 20 io port: [e000, e01f]
> 	[    0.340549] <pci>PCI: 0000:00:1a.7 reg 10 32bit mmio: [febffc00, febfffff]
> 		       ^^^^^^^^^
> How this can be an improvement for those who boot with ignore_loglevel,
> I don't know.

the subsystem tags should be cut out by dmesg by default, just like the 
normal <1> tags are cut out.

about your general point: it's valid observations. The idea would be to 
end this never ending unstable conflict of people adding printks for 
debug reasons versus people removing printks who'd like to have a nice 
looking bootup log.

Both point of views are correct in different usecases - and IMO the best 
solution is the consolidation hpa suggested and what Yinghai is working 
towards: to replace all the current ad-hoc debug printouts (with 
different switchlets strewn all across the kernel) with an ASCII based 
generic printk facility and a generic boot line option.

people adding printks without any KERN_ tag is fine - this facility is 
only interesting to subsystems who'd like to make use of it. (core code, 
ec. - the items that have a disproportionate weight in terms of system 
stability, and which thus have a disproportionate need to stay 
debuggable and regression-free)

[ and we also need a dynamic facility to change the filters via debugfs 
  btw - it should be possible to modify these printk filters after 
  bootup, runtime. Many subsystems have debug printks that make sense to 
  enable/disable after the system has booted up. ]

and it's bad and a showstopper if the default output of 'dmesg' 
degrades, like your noticed - those are bugs in the concept and need to 
be fixed.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-17  8:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-17  7:10 [PATCH 0/6] loglevel=pci:8,acpi:8,apic=8 support v5 Yinghai Lu
2008-09-17  7:10 ` [PATCH 1/6] add DEFINE_LOGLEVEL_SETUP v6 Yinghai Lu
2008-09-17  7:10 ` [PATCH 2/6] pci: add KERN_PCI Yinghai Lu
2008-09-17  7:10 ` [PATCH 3/6] pci: using printk(KERN_PCI v3 Yinghai Lu
2008-09-17  7:10 ` [PATCH 4/6] acpi: add KERN_ACPI v3 Yinghai Lu
2008-09-17  7:10 ` [PATCH 5/6] apci: dump slit with printk(KERN_ACPI...) Yinghai Lu
2008-09-17  7:10 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86: add KERN_APIC Yinghai Lu
2008-09-17  7:30 ` [PATCH 0/6] loglevel=pci:8,acpi:8,apic=8 support v5 Alexey Dobriyan
2008-09-17  8:47   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-09-17  9:25     ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-09-17  9:40       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-17 16:23     ` Yinghai Lu
2008-09-17 17:07     ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-17 18:10       ` Yinghai Lu
2008-09-17 18:17         ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-17 19:05           ` Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080917084754.GC24035@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox