From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] loglevel=pci:8,acpi:8,apic=8 support v5
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 10:47:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080917084754.GC24035@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080917073058.GA3770@x200.localdomain>
* Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:10:09AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > KERN_PCI
> > KERN_ACPI
> > v4: fix some checkpatch error and warning
> > v5: add default with DEFINE_LOGLEVE_SETUP_DEF
> > KERN_APIC
> >
> > usage:
> > in .h to have
> > #define KERN_PCI "<pci>"
> > in .c to have
> > DEFINE_LOGLEVEL_SETUP(pci, KERN_PCI, "pci:");
> > then could use
> > printk(KERN_DEBUG KERN_PCI fmt, ...);
> > and command line
> > loglevel=3,pci:8
> >
> > you can add different printk to different files of one subsys if you like
> > not just one susbsys one tag, and don't need to update kernel.h to add more tags
>
> I think all of this is overdesigned and stupid.
>
> People expecting that loglevels are exactly right so they can calm
> messages are like security-savvy people who expect all security
> relevant bugfixes carry CVE tag.
>
> grep says there are 50757 printk calls, only 32129 of them carry KERN_
> tag.
>
> Oh, and new and improved logs:
>
> [ 0.340326] pci 0000:00:01.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> [ 0.340326] pci 0000:00:01.0: PME# disabled
> [ 0.340326] <pci>PCI: 0000:00:1a.0 reg 20 io port: [dc00, dc1f]
> [ 0.340413] <pci>PCI: 0000:00:1a.1 reg 20 io port: [e000, e01f]
> [ 0.340549] <pci>PCI: 0000:00:1a.7 reg 10 32bit mmio: [febffc00, febfffff]
> ^^^^^^^^^
> How this can be an improvement for those who boot with ignore_loglevel,
> I don't know.
the subsystem tags should be cut out by dmesg by default, just like the
normal <1> tags are cut out.
about your general point: it's valid observations. The idea would be to
end this never ending unstable conflict of people adding printks for
debug reasons versus people removing printks who'd like to have a nice
looking bootup log.
Both point of views are correct in different usecases - and IMO the best
solution is the consolidation hpa suggested and what Yinghai is working
towards: to replace all the current ad-hoc debug printouts (with
different switchlets strewn all across the kernel) with an ASCII based
generic printk facility and a generic boot line option.
people adding printks without any KERN_ tag is fine - this facility is
only interesting to subsystems who'd like to make use of it. (core code,
ec. - the items that have a disproportionate weight in terms of system
stability, and which thus have a disproportionate need to stay
debuggable and regression-free)
[ and we also need a dynamic facility to change the filters via debugfs
btw - it should be possible to modify these printk filters after
bootup, runtime. Many subsystems have debug printks that make sense to
enable/disable after the system has booted up. ]
and it's bad and a showstopper if the default output of 'dmesg'
degrades, like your noticed - those are bugs in the concept and need to
be fixed.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-17 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-17 7:10 [PATCH 0/6] loglevel=pci:8,acpi:8,apic=8 support v5 Yinghai Lu
2008-09-17 7:10 ` [PATCH 1/6] add DEFINE_LOGLEVEL_SETUP v6 Yinghai Lu
2008-09-17 7:10 ` [PATCH 2/6] pci: add KERN_PCI Yinghai Lu
2008-09-17 7:10 ` [PATCH 3/6] pci: using printk(KERN_PCI v3 Yinghai Lu
2008-09-17 7:10 ` [PATCH 4/6] acpi: add KERN_ACPI v3 Yinghai Lu
2008-09-17 7:10 ` [PATCH 5/6] apci: dump slit with printk(KERN_ACPI...) Yinghai Lu
2008-09-17 7:10 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86: add KERN_APIC Yinghai Lu
2008-09-17 7:30 ` [PATCH 0/6] loglevel=pci:8,acpi:8,apic=8 support v5 Alexey Dobriyan
2008-09-17 8:47 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-09-17 9:25 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-09-17 9:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-17 16:23 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-09-17 17:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-17 18:10 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-09-17 18:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-17 19:05 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080917084754.GC24035@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox