Re: kernel.h: add ARRAY_AND_SIZE() macro to complement ARRAY_SIZE().

[Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>]

[Cyrill Gorcunov - Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 09:12:16PM +0400]
| [Christer Weinigel - Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 06:38:51PM +0200]
| > Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
| >> [Christer Weinigel - Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 04:28:19PM +0200]
| >> ...
| >>> In my opinion, making platform_add_devices into a magic macro is   
| >>> actually worse, since the same construct (array, ARRAY_SIZE(array)) 
| >>> is  used in many places, so one would have to do the same thing over 
| >>> and  over again for every function.  In that case it's better to have 
| >>> to  learn one macro once, and the ALL_CAPITALS should make it obvious 
| >>> that  it is a macro.
| >
| >> Well, can't agree with you :) It's my _presonal_ opinion.
| >> You could define it as
| >>
| >> static inline int platform_add_devices_array(struct platform_device **devs)
| >> {
| >> 	return platform_add_devices(devs, ARRAY_SIZE(devs));
| >> }
| >
| > Won't work.  You would have to use a macro.  The above would turn into:
| >
| >      platform_add_devices(devs, 1);
| >
| > or would if the __must_be_array check didn't catch it.
| >
| >   /Christer
| >
| 
| Ah...indeed, my bad :) gcc is not that smart (yet). So there only
| the macro is possible (just forget that it will be different
| namespace scope). Anyway even having it like a macro would be
| better then hiding args.
| 
| 		- Cyrill -

ie I mean

#define platform_add_devices_array(devs) \
	platform_add_devices(devs, ARRAY_SIZE(devs))

which should satisfy the requirements. Please note that I'm not
trying to say it should be done like that - just a propose which
looks for me much better the ARRAY_AND_SIZE in context of routine
argument.

ps: i was to use macro before inline func but someone inside me
was talking - hey, use function, not macro... and I gave up :)

		- Cyrill -