From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] debug: Introduce a dev_WARN() function
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 13:14:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080920201442.GA29622@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080920111113.18954688@infradead.org>
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 11:11:13AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 21:26:30 -0700
> Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 09:07:33PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> > > Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 21:03:06 -0700
> > > Subject: [PATCH] debug: Introduce a dev_WARN() function
> > >
> > > in the line of dev_printk(), this patch introduces a dev_WARN()
> > > macro, that takes a struct device and then a printk format/args set
> > > of arguments. Unlike dev_printk(), the effect is that of WARN() in
> > > that a full warning message (including filename/line, module list,
> > > versions and a backtrace) is printed in addition to the device name
> > > and the arguments.
> >
> > I like the idea, but we already have dev_warn(), so dev_WARN() might
> > be a bit confusing for people.
> >
> > Perhaps just documenting it with a docbook tag would suffice?
> >
>
> I added a set of comments, and also ended up doing the below USB change
Ok, that looks good, care to resend all of these, with the changed
original one so that I can apply them?
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-20 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-20 4:07 [PATCH] debug: Introduce a dev_WARN() function Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-20 4:08 ` [PATCH] debug: use dev_WARN() rather than WARN_ON() in device_pm_add() Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-20 4:26 ` [PATCH] debug: Introduce a dev_WARN() function Greg KH
2008-09-20 6:13 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-20 22:41 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-09-20 18:11 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-20 20:14 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080920201442.GA29622@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox