From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753554AbYIVTVj (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:21:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751205AbYIVTVb (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:21:31 -0400 Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com ([66.249.90.179]:12854 "EHLO ik-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751181AbYIVTVb (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:21:31 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=vJV9yAQkSLhBPFQumQEnHHU4n8klcUo2l+W0Urekb3QHl5GTHcUGXvtT9PzuTLmXvD ipyhrUCYi/4DFG5eDPPSP4k8IYulhr2zuND2Fl88wpi6XiQEIRWeXFX66NuLJeuo2FXJ izrEFMIBCQcc3LfFwib1IJbL58P5FIQM/aiig= Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 23:21:34 +0400 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Ingo Molnar , "Maciej W. Rozycki" , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: do_boot_cpu - add check if we have ESR register Message-ID: <20080922192134.GD22024@localhost> References: <20080922093603.GC7663@localhost> <20080922095148.GD7663@localhost> <86802c440809220257q4e1b4c81o534c957d919a6b3c@mail.gmail.com> <20080922101505.GF7663@localhost> <86802c440809221137v63e46951j78ae337275872b58@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86802c440809221137v63e46951j78ae337275872b58@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [Yinghai Lu - Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 11:37:21AM -0700] | On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 3:15 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: | > [Yinghai Lu - Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 02:57:17AM -0700] | > | > | > | > Actually it's resend of the patch. On previous attempt | > | > Yinghai was proposed to choose: | > | > | > | >> one apic_version or boot_cpu_apic_version could be enough | > | > | > | > but I think it should be different patch which does cleaning | > | > up variables usage. So for now I think _this_ patch is enough | > | > since idea is to prevent of touching nonexistant register rather | > | > code cleaning (whci could be done later). | > | | > | do we have systems that have mixed cpu supported with different apic version? | > | | > | YH | > | | > | > Yinghai what was the reason of this question? I've a suspicious | > you're planning to test apic version early and only _once_ so | > eliminating APIC_INTERGRATED call? Am I right? | | want to put more thing in genapic... | | YH | I think Ingo could drop this patch then at all. - Cyrill -