From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>
To: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
James Morris <jmorris@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morgan <morgan@kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] file capabilities: add no_file_caps switch (v2)
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:09:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200809222209.37218.agruen@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1222110964.18735.77.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil>
On Monday 22 September 2008 21:16:04 Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 13:48 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > (Resend of two patches from late August. If noone objects, would it be
> > possible to see this pair take a turn in security-testing?)
> >
> > Add a no_file_caps boot option when file capabilities are
> > compiled into the kernel (CONFIG_SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES=y).
>
> Is there a reason you didn't just use a filecaps=0/1 approach ala the
> selinux= boot parameter? And let the default value be selectable as
> well?
Sure, that would work as well, except that I think that file capabilities
should always default to "on" as they will become a standard security
mechanism before long. We just don't have much system management tool support
yet, and I would like to give that some more time safely, without putting
users at unnecessary risk.
I think we could get rid of the command line option again in a year or two ...
> Seems a bit confusing to offer a no_file_caps option with different
> behavior than disabling it at build time.
I agree. These other behaviorial changes should not depend on
CONFIG_SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES; the old behavior should just be fixed
instead.
Thanks,
Andreas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-22 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-22 18:48 [PATCH 1/2] file capabilities: add no_file_caps switch (v2) Serge E. Hallyn
2008-09-22 18:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] file capabilities: turn on by default Serge E. Hallyn
2008-09-22 19:03 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-09-22 19:56 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-09-22 21:09 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-09-22 22:53 ` Chris Wright
2008-09-22 19:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] file capabilities: add no_file_caps switch (v2) Stephen Smalley
2008-09-22 20:09 ` Andreas Gruenbacher [this message]
2008-09-22 21:50 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-09-22 22:08 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2008-09-23 6:48 ` James Morris
2008-09-22 22:57 ` Chris Wright
2008-09-23 15:51 ` Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] <beYE7-1Xc-41@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <beZ72-2GM-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <bf035-3Tp-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
2008-09-23 7:21 ` Markku Savela
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-08-28 19:54 Serge Hallyn
2008-08-29 0:35 ` Andrew G. Morgan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200809222209.37218.agruen@suse.de \
--to=agruen@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=jmorris@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=morgan@kernel.org \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox