From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753018AbYIYENd (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:13:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752778AbYIYENX (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:13:23 -0400 Received: from smtp121.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.64.94]:44793 "HELO smtp121.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750834AbYIYENW (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:13:22 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=NdUWU6I7GUJrg4F4x6LamD1+hgVlCy2L3WXAL75wvYhLPp4kI8VNw7gdbDAVKWfh1YdAd1uygG+xwSxcBM5O1GyugrNYLRFp+eejzhvuvxAzO3IMP+z0n2Ceul9lXpAxZijHvvLh65DOWm1AYJmTs90t0I3W7q2O/4qDm/lIFLE= ; X-YMail-OSG: iBy_beUVM1m4utLYTTllFjZLzebU8UrdgcWR4Pj5r6muKMCud160twQCQSk1QSJjgzFyvSZ2v.jDWzQ10t1XWf50k5jD4hBp1aT.ta9YtWo8AOg5YXHsukOJzdDuZJh25uzzS5W9gpSUxYlxjnK0oF0.8fdO X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: David Brownell To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] powerpc/qe: new call to revert a gpio to a dedicated function Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 21:13:18 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Andrew Morton , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Kumar Gala , Timur Tabi , Li Yang , Laurent Pinchart , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20080924000255.GA28054@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <200809241154.25722.david-b@pacbell.net> <20080924232956.GA27533@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> In-Reply-To: <20080924232956.GA27533@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200809242113.18992.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 24 September 2008, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > > Anyway, just want to thank you for your time and persistence on this > matter, you're forcing others' people brains to *work*. And since you > rejected this approach too, I have no other option but to implement > something else... something better. ;-) I think you have enough pieces in place to get that "something better" _very_ quickly. Or I'd feel worse about abusing those poor little grey cells. ;)