From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754122AbYIYCj5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2008 22:39:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752750AbYIYCjs (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2008 22:39:48 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:52837 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752647AbYIYCjq (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2008 22:39:46 -0400 From: Rusty Russell To: Len Brown Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for August 14 (sysfs/acpi errors) Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 12:39:29 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Andi Kleen , Greg KH , Kay Sievers , Randy Dunlap , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org References: <20080814172945.250a27f2.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <200808171513.13611.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200809251239.30416.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 24 September 2008 17:59:41 Len Brown wrote: > This problem first shows up with the addition of the > acpi.power_nocheck modparam, which is staged for 2.6.28. > Is 2.6.28 "current" or longer term? There's a proper fix in linux-next for 2.6.28. I was unclear about whether this ACPI change was going into 2.6.27; since it's not, there's no real issue. Hope that helps, Rusty.