public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Michael Davidson <md@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mbligh@google.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: TSC resync
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:51:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080927165107.GF4600@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6cc912950809261218u5a1bf8b8w216556b50d0e33ab@mail.gmail.com>


* Michael Davidson <md@google.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> 
> > hm, this patch syncs the TSCs every 20 seconds. That is enough to 
> > sync up AMD CPUs where the TSC slows down _slightly_ (at 10 ppm per 
> > second or so) when it's in HLT.
> 
> Actually by default it syncs them every time the CPU comes out of idle 
> or, optionally, on the first user space access to the TSC via RDTSC or 
> RDTSCP after the CPU has been in idle.

hm, that would be a performance problem.

coming out of idle is a fastpath: the CPU just got notified of more 
work, so any delay there costs.

[ going _to_ idle is more relaxed from a performance POV - but that 
  doesnt help much here. ]

and the default_idle()->tsc_resync_idle_notifier()->tsc_resync()-> 
ref_clock_tsc_read()->ref_clock() codepath does this:

+               offset = (uint32_t)hpet_readl(HPET_COUNTER) - ref_clock_last;

i.e. we read the HPET every time we exit from idle. The HPET usually 
sits in the southbridge and thus we add ~5000 cycles of overhead to 
every idle-exit event.

Another thing i noticed. You set the TSC via the 0x10 MSR:

+               asm __volatile__ (
+                       "xorl %%eax, %%eax\n\t"
+                       "cpuid\n\t"
+                       "movl $0x10, %%ecx\n\t"
+                       "rdmsr\n\t"
+                       "addl %%edi, %%eax\n\t"
+                       "adcl %%esi, %%edx\n\t"
+                       "wrmsr\n"

some CPUs (P3's?) will crop the TSC at 32 bits when wrtsc is used [even 
if a larger than 0xfffffffff value is presented in ax/dx. - i.e. the TSC 
will go round and round, with a rollover every few seconds.

those CPUs would have to be detected and excluded from this scheme.

	Ingo

      parent reply	other threads:[~2008-09-27 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-25 22:02 [PATCH] x86: TSC resync Michael Davidson
2008-09-26  7:02 ` Ingo Molnar
     [not found]   ` <6cc912950809261218u5a1bf8b8w216556b50d0e33ab@mail.gmail.com>
2008-09-27 16:51     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080927165107.GF4600@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbligh@google.com \
    --cc=md@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox