From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757170AbYI0RyY (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:54:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754496AbYI0RyA (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:54:00 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:50827 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756000AbYI0Rx7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:53:59 -0400 Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:53:46 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric?= Weisbecker Cc: Pekka Paalanen , Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Patch -tip 1/3] Tracing/ftrace: Relay unhandled entry output Message-ID: <20080927175346.GA1108@elte.hu> References: <48DB81BA.2050204@gmail.com> <20080925123802.GA6900@elte.hu> <48DBA683.8000708@gmail.com> <20080925180916.75d3c9ec@daedalus.pq.iki.fi> <20080925184919.016d8957@daedalus.pq.iki.fi> <20080925190149.208ee3a4@daedalus.pq.iki.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -0.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-0.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_20 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -0.5 BAYES_20 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 5 to 20% [score: 0.0943] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Frédéric Weisbecker wrote: > So, unless someone is opposed to. I will send a patch which define > three possible values for the print_line callback. I will define these > values on trace.h Why not: > > #define TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE 0 > #define TRACE_TYPE_HANDLED 1 > #define TRACE_TYPE_UNHANDLED 2 => will relay on default functions > > Hmm I'm questionning about the relevance of this kind of patch since > the tracing API is in refactoring... btw., i removed the 2 patches that got NAK-ed by Pekka from tip/master - could you please re-send whatever consensus patch you come up with Pekka? Ingo