From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753040AbYI3Dyo (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2008 23:54:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751590AbYI3Dyg (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2008 23:54:36 -0400 Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.143]:44252 "EHLO e3.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751157AbYI3Dyf (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2008 23:54:35 -0400 Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:54:12 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , LKML , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [GIT pull] timer fixes for .27 Message-ID: <20080930035412.GA7049@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20080929224440.GG6697@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1222746116.9006.23.camel@pasglop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1222746116.9006.23.camel@pasglop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 01:41:56PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 15:44 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > Please pull the latest timers-fixes-for-linus git tree from: > > > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git > > timers-fixes-for-linus > > > > > > The patches fix hard to trigger bugs in the CPU offline code of > > > hrtimers which were noticed by Paul McKenney recently. In the worst > > > case they can leave migrated hrtimers in a stale state. > > > > Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney > > Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney > > Ah, so we found and fixed these ? For "we" == Thomas, yes. ;-) Thanx, Paul > Linus, those bugs are actually a regression from when we didn't use the > new timer code (which isn't that long ago). It would be nice to have the > fixes in .27 (and thus in the various distros that will derive from it) > but I would understand if the size of the patch made you choke that late > in the -rc cycle... In which case we'll be in for more backports :-) > > Cheers, > Ben. > >