From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: unpredictability in scheduler test results -- still present
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:12:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080930111217.GA21367@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48E0F7B9.3040301@nortel.com>
* Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com> wrote:
>
>>> It turns out that disabling CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE makes the load
>>> balancing problem go away and causes all cpus to be used.
>>>
>>> With this option enabled, the problem seems to be present as far back
>>> as 2.6.27-rc2. (2.6.27-rc1 doesn't compile on my machine, and 2.6.26
>>> doesn't have ftrace).
>>>
>>> I have no idea why turning on dynamic ftrace would affect load
>>> balancing behaviour, but it's very repeatable. The very first test
>>> run after booting works fine, and all successive runs fail to balance
>>> properly.
>
>> OTOH, what does 'truning on dftrace' exactly mean? Just enabling it in
>> the .config, or also activating it via /debug/tracing/current_tracer?
>
> Just enabling it in the .config is enough to trigger the behaviour
> change. I'm not explicitly activating any traces.
ok, that would be a clear ftrace bug i guess?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-30 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-18 22:45 unpredictability in scheduler test results Chris Friesen
2008-09-24 15:19 ` unpredictability in scheduler test results -- still present Chris Friesen
2008-09-24 23:37 ` Chris Friesen
2008-09-27 20:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-29 15:43 ` Chris Friesen
2008-09-30 11:12 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-09-30 21:14 ` Chris Friesen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080930111217.GA21367@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=cfriesen@nortel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox