From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@mailshack.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix: x86: remove cpu_vendor_dev
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 08:49:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081001064942.GA651@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86802c440809301337i1bbf6e9ckb8de8a1ef08955d3@mail.gmail.com>
* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Alexander van Heukelum
> <heukelum@mailshack.com> wrote:
> > x86_64-kernels after commit 10a434fcb "x86: remove cpu_vendor_dev"
> > crashed on qemu-system-x86_64 due to a typo in vmlinux_64.lds.S.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 06:41:33PM +0200, Alexander van Heukelum wrote:
> >> Moreover, a defconfig won't run :-/ (on qemu-system-x86_64).
> >> Bisection pointed to commit 10a434fcb "x86: remove cpu_vendor_dev".
> >> The kernel crashes early with a general protection fault in a call
> >> to strnlen. I have no idea what goes wrong, yet.
> >
> > It took quite some time, but I found the problem... I'll leave
> > the other one to you ;).
> >
> > Greetings,
> > Alexander
> >
> > arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux_64.lds.S | 2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux_64.lds.S b/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux_64.lds.S
> > index 201e81a..46e0544 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux_64.lds.S
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux_64.lds.S
> > @@ -172,8 +172,8 @@ SECTIONS
> > .x86_cpu_dev.init : AT(ADDR(.x86_cpu_dev.init) - LOAD_OFFSET) {
> > *(.x86_cpu_dev.init)
> > }
> > - SECURITY_INIT
> > __x86_cpu_dev_end = .;
> > + SECURITY_INIT
> >
> > . = ALIGN(8);
> > .parainstructions : AT(ADDR(.parainstructions) - LOAD_OFFSET) {
> >
>
> that is merging problem, Ingo should fix that already...
indeed. I've fixed it in tip/x86/traps by applying Alexander's patch.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-01 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-30 16:41 [PATCH 0/4] traps: x86: more unification Alexander van Heukelum
2008-09-30 16:41 ` [PATCH 1/4] traps: x86_64: split out math_error and simd_math_error Alexander van Heukelum
2008-09-30 16:41 ` [PATCH 2/4] traps: i386: factor out lazy io-bitmap copy Alexander van Heukelum
2008-09-30 16:41 ` [PATCH 3/4] traps: x86: introduce dotraplinkage Alexander van Heukelum
2008-09-30 16:41 ` [PATCH 4/4] traps: x86: converge do_debug handlers Alexander van Heukelum
2008-09-30 19:37 ` [PATCH] fix: x86: remove cpu_vendor_dev Alexander van Heukelum
2008-09-30 20:37 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-10-01 6:49 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-10-01 7:22 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-10-01 7:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-01 14:53 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-10-01 7:06 ` [PATCH 0/4] traps: x86: more unification Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081001064942.GA651@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=heukelum@mailshack.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox