From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
jonathan@jonmasters.org, sdietrich@suse.de
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 0/5] genirq: add infrastructure for threaded interrupt handlers
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 16:40:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081001164013.f72036c9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081001162950.61887d08@infradead.org>
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 16:29:50 -0700
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 16:23:33 -0700
> Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm a bit surprised to see that there is no facility for per-cpu
> > interrupt threads?
> >
>
> per handler is the right approach (that way, if one dies, all other
> interrupts will likely keep working)
>
> now.. normally an interrupt only goes to one cpu, so effectively it is
> per cpu already anyway
Yes, if a) the thread was asleep when it was woken up and b) if the
scheduler does the right thing and wakes the thread on the CPU which
called wake_up().
The ongoing sagas of tbench/mysql/volanomark regressions make me think
that any behaviour which we "expect" of the scheduler should be
triple-checked daily :(
> we should however make the irq threads follow the affinity masks of the
> irq... that'd be an easy add-on and probably worthwhile.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-01 23:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-01 23:02 [RFC patch 0/5] genirq: add infrastructure for threaded interrupt handlers Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-01 23:02 ` [RFC patch 1/5] genirq: make irqreturn_t an enum Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-01 23:02 ` [RFC patch 2/5] genirq: add a quick check handler Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-02 0:47 ` Jon Masters
2008-10-02 5:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-10-02 10:51 ` Jon Masters
2008-10-02 22:06 ` Greg KH
2008-10-02 4:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-10-03 8:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-10-03 10:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-01 23:02 ` [RFC patch 3/5] genirq: add threaded interrupt handler support Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-02 5:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-10-01 23:02 ` [RFC patch 4/5] genirq: add a helper to check whether the irq thread should run Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-01 23:02 ` [RFC patch 5/5] genirq: make irq threading robust Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-02 0:52 ` Jon Masters
2008-10-02 5:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-10-01 23:23 ` [RFC patch 0/5] genirq: add infrastructure for threaded interrupt handlers Andrew Morton
2008-10-01 23:29 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-10-01 23:40 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-10-01 23:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-02 0:40 ` Jon Masters
2008-10-02 22:07 ` Greg KH
2008-10-08 22:18 ` Ingo Oeser
2008-10-02 1:53 ` Daniel Walker
2008-10-02 15:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-10-02 15:48 ` Daniel Walker
2008-10-02 18:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-02 19:04 ` Daniel Walker
2008-10-02 19:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-10-02 19:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-02 20:09 ` Daniel Walker
2008-10-02 20:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-10-02 20:48 ` Daniel Walker
2008-10-02 21:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-10-02 21:30 ` Daniel Walker
2008-10-02 22:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-10-02 23:24 ` Daniel Walker
2008-10-03 0:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-03 14:44 ` Daniel Walker
2008-10-02 14:46 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-02 21:31 ` Greg KH
2008-10-02 22:33 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-10-03 3:25 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-03 3:48 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-10-03 4:35 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-03 3:23 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-21 1:32 ` [RFC patch] genirq threading for ehci, ohci and uhci USB hosts Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2008-10-21 2:07 ` Jonathan Woithe
2008-10-21 10:29 ` [RFC patch] genirq threading (v2) for ehci, ohci and uhci USB hosts and ohci1394 Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081001164013.f72036c9.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=jonathan@jonmasters.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sdietrich@suse.de \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox