public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olaf Kirch <okir@suse.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	kkeil@suse.de, agospoda@redhat.com, arjan@linux.intel.com,
	"Graham, David" <david.graham@intel.com>,
	"Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>,
	"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@intel.com>,
	chris.jones@canonical.com, tim.gardner@intel.com,
	airlied@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/12] e1000e: debug contention on NVM SWFLAG
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 21:08:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200810022108.24028.okir@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200810022107.23487.okir@suse.de>

On Thursday 02 October 2008 21:07:22 Olaf Kirch wrote:
> That was openSuse 11.1 without any patches

I should have said 11.1 beta1.

Olaf
-- 
Neo didn't bring down the Matrix. SOA did.
				--soafacts.com


  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-02 19:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-30  3:19 [RFC PATCH 00/12] e1000e debug and protection patches Jesse Brandeburg
2008-09-30  3:19 ` [RFC PATCH 01/12] x86: export set_memory_ro and set_memory_rw Jesse Brandeburg
2008-09-30  7:07   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-30  3:19 ` [RFC PATCH 02/12] On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote: Jesse Brandeburg
2008-10-02 22:23   ` Jesse Barnes
2008-10-03 20:46     ` David Miller
2008-10-03 21:29       ` Jesse Barnes
2008-10-03 21:45         ` Jiri Kosina
2008-10-03 23:28           ` Jesse Brandeburg
2008-10-03 23:30             ` Jesse Brandeburg
2008-10-04 10:21             ` Jiri Kosina
2008-10-04 11:02               ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-05  1:24                 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2008-10-05  8:51                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-05 15:05                     ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-10-05 15:55                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-05 16:02                         ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-10-05 16:16                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-05 17:01                             ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-10-07 23:19     ` David Miller
2008-09-30  3:19 ` [RFC PATCH 03/12] e1000e: reset swflag after resetting hardware Jesse Brandeburg
2008-09-30  3:19 ` [RFC PATCH 04/12] e1000e: do not ever sleep in interrupt context Jesse Brandeburg
2008-09-30  3:19 ` [RFC PATCH 05/12] e1000e: fix lockdep issues Jesse Brandeburg
2008-09-30  3:19 ` [RFC PATCH 06/12] e1000e: drop stats lock Jesse Brandeburg
2008-09-30  3:19 ` [RFC PATCH 07/12] e1000e: debug contention on NVM SWFLAG Jesse Brandeburg
2008-10-02 14:28   ` Jiri Kosina
2008-10-02 15:03     ` Olaf Kirch
2008-10-02 16:27       ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-10-02 17:33         ` Olaf Kirch
2008-10-02 18:58           ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-02 19:07             ` Olaf Kirch
2008-10-02 19:08               ` Olaf Kirch [this message]
2008-10-02 18:02         ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-02 23:42       ` [PATCH] e1000e: prevent concurrent access to NVRAM Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-03  0:19         ` Jesse Brandeburg
2008-10-03  0:28           ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-30  3:19 ` [RFC PATCH 08/12] e1000e: allow bad checksum Jesse Brandeburg
2008-09-30  8:38   ` Jiri Kosina
2008-09-30  3:20 ` [RFC PATCH 09/12] e1000e: dump eeprom to dmesg for ich8/9 Jesse Brandeburg
2008-09-30  3:20 ` [RFC PATCH 10/12] e1000e: Use set_memory_ro()/set_memory_rw() to protect flash memory Jesse Brandeburg
2008-09-30  3:20 ` [RFC PATCH 11/12] e1000e: write protect ICHx NVM to prevent malicious write/erase Jesse Brandeburg
2008-09-30 12:40   ` Jiri Kosina
2008-09-30 15:47     ` Allan, Bruce W
2008-10-01 13:29       ` Jiri Kosina
2008-10-01 19:13         ` Allan, Bruce W
2008-09-30  3:20 ` [RFC PATCH 12/12] update version Jesse Brandeburg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200810022108.24028.okir@suse.de \
    --to=okir@suse.de \
    --cc=agospoda@redhat.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.w.allan@intel.com \
    --cc=chris.jones@canonical.com \
    --cc=david.graham@intel.com \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=john.ronciak@intel.com \
    --cc=kkeil@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tim.gardner@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox