From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, IvDoorn@gmail.com, hmh@hmh.eng.br,
sitsofe@yahoo.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rfkill-input doesn't work until 5 minutes after boot
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 15:39:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081004153929.846a0bde.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081004204342.GA29620@srcf.ucam.org>
On Sat, 4 Oct 2008 21:43:43 +0100 Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> wrote:
> rfkill-input implements debounce as follows:
>
> if (time_after(jiffies, task->last + msecs_to_jiffies(200))) {
>
> However, task->last is initialised to 0 while jiffies starts at -300*HZ.
> Any input within 5 minutes of kernel start is therefore ignored. Fix by
> initialising task->last correctly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
>
>
> diff --git a/net/rfkill/rfkill-input.c b/net/rfkill/rfkill-input.c
> index e5b6955..de75934 100644
> --- a/net/rfkill/rfkill-input.c
> +++ b/net/rfkill/rfkill-input.c
> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ static void rfkill_schedule_toggle(struct rfkill_task *task)
> .mutex = __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(n.mutex), \
> .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(n.lock), \
> .desired_state = RFKILL_STATE_UNBLOCKED, \
> + .last = INITIAL_JIFFIES, \
> }
>
> static DEFINE_RFKILL_TASK(rfkill_wlan, RFKILL_TYPE_WLAN);
>
That'll only work as intended if CONFIG_RFKILL_INPUT=y? If the module
is loaded 10 minutes after boot, the timestamp is still wrong. It might
happily happen to work, but will still fail after 2^31 jiffies (or something
like that).
Generally speaking, INITIAL_JIFFIES is a secret internal debugging
detail and its use out in general kernel code is a red flag.
I think this initialisation should be done at runtime somehow.
> .27 material?
yup.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-04 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-04 20:43 [PATCH] rfkill-input doesn't work until 5 minutes after boot Matthew Garrett
2008-10-04 22:03 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-10-04 22:39 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-10-04 22:50 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-10-05 0:43 ` [PATCH v2] " Matthew Garrett
2008-10-05 4:43 ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-05 10:58 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-10-05 11:02 ` [PATCH v3] " Matthew Garrett
2008-10-05 13:51 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-10-05 14:31 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-10-06 2:16 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-10-05 19:04 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-10-05 21:24 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-10-05 21:33 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-10-06 5:52 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-10-06 16:31 ` Ivo van Doorn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081004153929.846a0bde.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=IvDoorn@gmail.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=sitsofe@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox