public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, kkeil@suse.de, agospoda@redhat.com,
	david.graham@intel.com, bruce.w.allan@intel.com,
	john.ronciak@intel.com, chris.jones@canonical.com,
	tim.gardner@canonical.com, airlied@gmail.com,
	Olaf Kirch <okir@suse.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 02/12] On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote:
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 10:01:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081005100117.2277d70c@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0810051809130.3398@apollo>

On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 18:16:29 +0200 (CEST)
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:

> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 17:55:14 +0200 (CEST)
> > Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > > Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> > > > > > > Exactly. The access to a ro region results in a fault. I
> > > > > > > have nowhere seen that trigger, but I can reproduce the
> > > > > > > trylock() WARN_ON, which confirms that there is
> > > > > > > concurrent access to the NVRAM registers. The backtrace
> > > > > > > pattern is similar to the one you have seen.
> > > > > > are you still getting WARN_ON *with* all the mutex based
> > > > > > fixes already applied?
> > > > > 
> > > > > The WARN_ON triggers with current mainline. Is there any
> > > > > fixlet in Linus tree missing ?
> > > > > 
> > > > > > with the mutex patches in place (without protection patch)
> > > > > > we are still reproducing the issue, until we apply the
> > > > > > set_memory_ro patch.
> > > > > 
> > > > > That does not make sense to me. If the memory_ro patch is
> > > > > providing _real_ protection then you _must_ run into an access
> > > > > violation. If not, then the patch just papers over the real
> > > > > problem in some mysterious way.
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > not if the bad code is doing copy_to_user .... (or similar)
> > > 
> > > You mean: copy_from_user :) This would require that the e1000e
> > > nvram region is writable via copy_from_user by an e1000e user
> > > space interface. A quick grep does not reviel such a horrible
> > > interface.
> > 
> > I meant a "copy_to_user" to a duff pointer, somewhere in the kernel.
> 
> Hmm, don't we check the *to address on copy_to_user ?
> 

fair point

and we do exception catching for copy_from_user as well on the source,
just by how it's implemented

-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org

  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-05 17:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-30  3:19 [RFC PATCH 00/12] e1000e debug and protection patches Jesse Brandeburg
2008-09-30  3:19 ` [RFC PATCH 01/12] x86: export set_memory_ro and set_memory_rw Jesse Brandeburg
2008-09-30  7:07   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-30  3:19 ` [RFC PATCH 02/12] On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote: Jesse Brandeburg
2008-10-02 22:23   ` Jesse Barnes
2008-10-03 20:46     ` David Miller
2008-10-03 21:29       ` Jesse Barnes
2008-10-03 21:45         ` Jiri Kosina
2008-10-03 23:28           ` Jesse Brandeburg
2008-10-03 23:30             ` Jesse Brandeburg
2008-10-04 10:21             ` Jiri Kosina
2008-10-04 11:02               ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-05  1:24                 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2008-10-05  8:51                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-05 15:05                     ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-10-05 15:55                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-05 16:02                         ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-10-05 16:16                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-05 17:01                             ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2008-10-07 23:19     ` David Miller
2008-09-30  3:19 ` [RFC PATCH 03/12] e1000e: reset swflag after resetting hardware Jesse Brandeburg
2008-09-30  3:19 ` [RFC PATCH 04/12] e1000e: do not ever sleep in interrupt context Jesse Brandeburg
2008-09-30  3:19 ` [RFC PATCH 05/12] e1000e: fix lockdep issues Jesse Brandeburg
2008-09-30  3:19 ` [RFC PATCH 06/12] e1000e: drop stats lock Jesse Brandeburg
2008-09-30  3:19 ` [RFC PATCH 07/12] e1000e: debug contention on NVM SWFLAG Jesse Brandeburg
2008-10-02 14:28   ` Jiri Kosina
2008-10-02 15:03     ` Olaf Kirch
2008-10-02 16:27       ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-10-02 17:33         ` Olaf Kirch
2008-10-02 18:58           ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-02 19:07             ` Olaf Kirch
2008-10-02 19:08               ` Olaf Kirch
2008-10-02 18:02         ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-02 23:42       ` [PATCH] e1000e: prevent concurrent access to NVRAM Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-03  0:19         ` Jesse Brandeburg
2008-10-03  0:28           ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-30  3:19 ` [RFC PATCH 08/12] e1000e: allow bad checksum Jesse Brandeburg
2008-09-30  8:38   ` Jiri Kosina
2008-09-30  3:20 ` [RFC PATCH 09/12] e1000e: dump eeprom to dmesg for ich8/9 Jesse Brandeburg
2008-09-30  3:20 ` [RFC PATCH 10/12] e1000e: Use set_memory_ro()/set_memory_rw() to protect flash memory Jesse Brandeburg
2008-09-30  3:20 ` [RFC PATCH 11/12] e1000e: write protect ICHx NVM to prevent malicious write/erase Jesse Brandeburg
2008-09-30 12:40   ` Jiri Kosina
2008-09-30 15:47     ` Allan, Bruce W
2008-10-01 13:29       ` Jiri Kosina
2008-10-01 19:13         ` Allan, Bruce W
2008-09-30  3:20 ` [RFC PATCH 12/12] update version Jesse Brandeburg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081005100117.2277d70c@linux.intel.com \
    --to=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=agospoda@redhat.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=bruce.w.allan@intel.com \
    --cc=chris.jones@canonical.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david.graham@intel.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=john.ronciak@intel.com \
    --cc=kkeil@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=okir@suse.de \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tim.gardner@canonical.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox