From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ring-buffer: less locking and only disable preemption
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 12:13:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081005101341.GH29909@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081004222713.GA1813@Krystal>
* Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org> wrote:
> explains that code modification on x86 SMP systems is not only a
> matter of atomicity, but also a matter of not changing the code
> underneath a running CPU which is making assumptions that it won't
> change underneath without issuing a synchronizing instruction before
> the new code is used by the CPU. The scheme you propose here takes
> care of atomicity, but does not take care of the synchronization
> problem. A sync_core() would probably be required when such
> modification is detected.
that's wrong, my scheme protects against these cases: before _any_ code
is modified we set the redo_pending atomic flag, and make sure that
previous NMI handlers have stopped executing. (easy enough)
then the atomic update of redo_pending should be a sufficient barrier
for another CPU to notice the pending transaction.
Note that the cross-CPU modification can still be 'half done' when the
NMI hits, that's why we execute modify_code_redo() to 'redo' the full
modification before executing further NMI code. That is executed _on the
CPU_ that triggers an NMI, and the CPU itself is self-consistent.
( The modify_code_redo() will have to do a sync_cores() of course, like
all self-modifying code, to flush speculative execution. )
> Also, speaking of plain atomicity, you scheme does not seem to protect
> against NMIs running on a different CPU, because the non-atomic change
> could race with such NMI.
That's wrong too. Another CPU will notice that redo_pending is set and
will execute modify_code_redo() from its NMI handler _before_ calling
all the notifiers and other 'wide' code paths.
the only item that needs to be marked 'notrace' is only the highlevel
do_nmi() handler itself. (as that executes before we have a chance to
execute modify_code_redo())
So we trade a large, fragile, and unmapped set of NMI-implicated
codepaths for a very tight and well controlled an easy to maintain
codepath.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-05 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-04 6:00 [PATCH 0/3] ring-buffer: less locking and only disable preemption Steven Rostedt
2008-10-04 6:00 ` [PATCH 1/3] ring-buffer: move page indexes into page headers Steven Rostedt
2008-10-04 6:00 ` [PATCH 2/3] ring-buffer: make reentrant Steven Rostedt
2008-10-04 6:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] ftrace: make some tracers reentrant Steven Rostedt
2008-10-04 8:40 ` [PATCH 0/3] ring-buffer: less locking and only disable preemption Ingo Molnar
2008-10-04 14:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-10-04 14:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-04 17:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-04 22:27 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-10-04 23:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-10-06 17:10 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-10-05 10:13 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-10-06 13:53 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-10-04 16:33 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-10-04 17:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-10-06 17:13 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081005101341.GH29909@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=compudj@krystal.dyndns.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox