From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>
To: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@lists.osdl.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] user namespaces: introduce user_struct->user_namespace relationship
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:11:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081006141101.GB15419@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.1.10.0810060846020.30516@tundra.namei.org>
Quoting James Morris (jmorris@namei.org):
> On Fri, 3 Oct 2008, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>
> > Hi James,
> >
> > here are 3 patches to fix up the user namespaces a bit in preparation
> > for real userns work to begin. Andrew had suggested that these be
> > rebased on top of your -next tree because they will conflict with
> > the credentials work. But it looks like much of the credentials stuff
> > isn't in your next branch. If you'd prefer that I port these to
> > creds-next, please let me know. I'll have to do it eventually :)
>
> creds-next is dead.
>
> Code ready for the next merge window is in the 'next' branch, while the
> current creds code is in the 'creds-next-subsys' branch, which hasn't been
> picked up in linux-next yet because of LPC and sfr's vacation.
>
> When do you expect these patches to be sent upstream? Are they ready now
> as an incremental change for 2.6.27?
Oh I'm not trying to get them into 2.6.28, I'm just trying to get them
more widely tested, hopefully aiming for 2.6.29. They have been stable
in all of my tests, and the last patch fixes a real (behavioral - not
oops-inducing) bug in the current code, but I'm trying to figure out
which path they should take.
thanks,
-serge
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-06 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-04 1:36 [PATCH 1/3] user namespaces: introduce user_struct->user_namespace relationship Serge E. Hallyn
2008-10-04 1:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] user namespaces: move user_ns from nsproxy into user struct Serge E. Hallyn
2008-10-04 1:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] user namespaces: reset task's credentials on CLONE_NEWUSER Serge E. Hallyn
2008-10-05 21:50 ` [PATCH 1/3] user namespaces: introduce user_struct->user_namespace relationship James Morris
2008-10-06 14:11 ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
2008-10-06 21:50 ` James Morris
2008-10-07 17:05 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-10-07 21:08 ` James Morris
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-08-26 18:53 Serge E. Hallyn
2008-08-28 0:07 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-28 0:52 ` Serge E. Hallyn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081006141101.GB15419@us.ibm.com \
--to=serue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox