Re: [PATCH] PCI probing debug message uniformization

[Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>]

On Friday, October 3, 2008 3:50 pm Vincent Legoll wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> wrote:
> > It'll be easier for Jesse if you include the proper changelog again
> > with just a 1-2 line sample of the changed messages.  BTW, the "--"
> > before your sig confused my mailer into not quoting the patch itself,
> > hence the screwed up formatting below.
>
> The "-- " line is the start-of-.sig marker have I been taught in my
> school days, I think they then spoke about netiquette...
>
> > dev_info() is exactly equivalent to dev_printk(KERN_INFO).  I usually
> > use dev_info(), though I'm a bit ambivalent because it's nice to be
> > able to grep for "printk".
>
> I left dev_printk(KERN_INFO, ...) for grepability
>
> > Anyway, maybe you can correct the grammar
> > of "enabled forcedly" to something like "you can enable with ..." when
> > you re-post with the changelog.
>
> I've used "You can enable it back with", hoping the gramar is right
>
> > (Note that dev_dbg() is NOT exactly equivalent to dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG),
> > so you can't change all of them.  dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG) is always
> > compiled in, while dev_dbg() is only compiled in when "DEBUG" is
> > defined.)
>
> Thanks for the hint, for I may have jumped the gun on those "other"
> cleanups ;-)
>
> So here is the new version cut'n'pasted from git-format-patch

Can you respin against linux-next and send me a fresh copy?  This one seems to 
have been corrupted somehow (sorry for the slow reply, it's been sitting in 
my 'to apply' mbox for awhile now).

Thanks,
Jesse