From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [git pull, take 2] x86 updates for v2.6.28, phase #9, sparse IRQ?support
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:50:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081010195028.GC31926@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200810101234.57440.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
* Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
> On Friday, October 10, 2008 12:11 pm Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> > >> Linus,
> > >>
> > >> Please pull the latest x86-v28-for-linus-phase9 git tree from:
> > >>
> > >> Sparse IRQ support - make NR_IRQS dynamic by turning it into nr_irqs,
> > >> an by creating irq descriptors in a sparse way.
> > >>
> > >> Includes a number of dependent x86 topics: timers/hpet-percpu, IO-APIC
> > >> and local APIC code unification, UV support updates.
> > >>
> > >> Has been cross-built on all architectures we could get crosscompilers
> > >> for:
> > >>
> > >> http://www.tglx.de/autoqa/index
> > >>
> > >> It should be largely uneventful for sparse-irq unaware, non-x86
> > >> architectures.
> > >
> > > please find updated pull request below. Relative to phase-N-1. Updates
> > > from today in this class of topics:
> > >
> > > b570868: x86: apic - unify APIC_DIVISOR
> > >
> > > And i removed:
> > >
> > > eada62c: acpi/x86: introduce __apci_map_table, v4
> > >
> > > [ Cc:-ed Yinghai for that - we can live without that patch (i.e. we at
> > > most get a leak warning) and can have that via acpi.git, correct? ]
> >
> > yes. we have several patches that even didn't pick up for a while.
> >
> > also please ask Linus to pull pci tree from Jesse before sparseirq.
> >
> > because we need
> > PCI: change MSI-x vector to 32bit
> >
> > in pci tree.
>
> I should have my pull ready soon; I'd like to do some cross compile tests with
> my latest bits first. But I think Ingo has a copy of this commit anyway so
> it may be ok for Linus to pull anyway.
Correct, it's safe to pull it, because irq/sparseirq has this commit:
9e40236: pci: change msi-x vector to 32bit
it's content-equal with yours so your merge should be painless.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-10 19:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-10 0:17 [git pull] x86 updates for v2.6.28, phase #9, sparse IRQ support Ingo Molnar
2008-10-10 18:59 ` [git pull, take 2] " Ingo Molnar
2008-10-10 19:11 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-10-10 19:34 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-10-10 19:50 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-10-10 19:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-10 20:11 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-10-10 20:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-10 20:15 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081010195028.GC31926@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox