From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752496AbYJKEn6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:43:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750907AbYJKEnu (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:43:50 -0400 Received: from outbound-mail-119.bluehost.com ([69.89.22.19]:53560 "HELO outbound-mail-119.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750869AbYJKEnu (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:43:50 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=virtuousgeek.org; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id:X-Identified-User; b=RKNKWCgVpRhog9hUSCQPIw5sGoDmbco3Ms/eZYphtuTCL9Xf0M/oVgByt7JAjFEHwWVM8y0aMbtpiRgaLbp2x7TaKT2DaIBNHyiyXLqkSxmo8uJbJhaf0uS2WwzMzZsb; From: Jesse Barnes To: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] PM: Simplify the new suspend/hibernation framework for devices Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:43:17 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , ACPI Devel Maling List , Alan Stern , Andrew Morton , Len Brown , Linus Torvalds , LKML , pm list , Hannes Reinecke References: <200810060055.07601.rjw@sisk.pl> <200810062246.06654.rjw@sisk.pl> <20081010215242.GB21890@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20081010215242.GB21890@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810102143.17975.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> X-Identified-User: {642:box128.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 12.53.67.130 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday, October 10, 2008 2:52 pm Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 10:46:05PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, 6 of October 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Hi Greg, > > > > > > I promised at the KS that I would simplify the new suspend/hibernation > > > framework for devices to avoid the confusion with two types of PM > > > operations and pointers to PM operations from too many places. > > > > > > The appended patch is intended for this purpose. Unfortunately, I > > > can't split it into subsystem-related patches, because compilation > > > would be broken between them. > > > > > > The patch applies to linux-next, but it's trivial to make it apply to > > > the mainline. It's been compiled on x86 (both 32-bit and 64-bit) and > > > tested on hp nx6325, doesn't appear to break anything. > > > > This one had a checkpatch.pl problem, sorry for that. Updated patch is > > appended. > > I've added this to my tree (Jesse, is this ok, as it does have a PCI > portion?) > > But it's too late for .28, especially due to the -next tree not up and > running right now. I'll let it bake in -mm and -next and it should go > into .29. > > Is that ok? There are a couple of trivial PCI bits, but it's fine if they come in through your tree for 2.6.29. Thanks, Jesse