From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763372AbYJJWr2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:47:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754637AbYJJWrG (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:47:06 -0400 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:39644 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754130AbYJJWrB (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:47:01 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:43:43 -0700 From: Greg KH To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List , Alan Stern , Andrew Morton , Jesse Barnes , Len Brown , Linus Torvalds , LKML , pm list , Hannes Reinecke Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] PM: Simplify the new suspend/hibernation framework for devices Message-ID: <20081010224343.GA30203@kroah.com> References: <200810060055.07601.rjw@sisk.pl> <200810062246.06654.rjw@sisk.pl> <20081010215242.GB21890@kroah.com> <200810110047.35993.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200810110047.35993.rjw@sisk.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:47:34AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, 10 of October 2008, Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 10:46:05PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Monday, 6 of October 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > Hi Greg, > > > > > > > > I promised at the KS that I would simplify the new suspend/hibernation > > > > framework for devices to avoid the confusion with two types of PM > > > > operations and pointers to PM operations from too many places. > > > > > > > > The appended patch is intended for this purpose. Unfortunately, I can't > > > > split it into subsystem-related patches, because compilation would be broken > > > > between them. > > > > > > > > The patch applies to linux-next, but it's trivial to make it apply to the > > > > mainline. It's been compiled on x86 (both 32-bit and 64-bit) and tested > > > > on hp nx6325, doesn't appear to break anything. > > > > > > This one had a checkpatch.pl problem, sorry for that. Updated patch is > > > appended. > > > > I've added this to my tree (Jesse, is this ok, as it does have a PCI > > portion?) > > > > But it's too late for .28, especially due to the -next tree not up and > > running right now. I'll let it bake in -mm and -next and it should go > > into .29. > > > > Is that ok? > > Well, if anyone pushes anything depending on this framework for .27, that will > become a !@#$%^&* mess (we've had this problem once already). Do we have any drivers that depend on this framework in any tree? Is anyone needing this now? thanks, greg k-h