From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [bug] latest -git boot hang
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 16:33:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081011143355.GA6274@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081011140826.GS19428@kernel.dk>
* Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > > > It does sound like perhaps the option should be hidden more, if it's
> > > > really only reasonably enabled for some very specialized distro
> > > > debuggers, not normal kernel people.
> > >
> > > Yeap, if fedora didn't work, I think it should be hidden. Do we
> > > already have place to hide things like this?
> >
> > in my local testing i'm using simple annotations like the one attached
> > further below. Any objections against sending my BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED kit
> > upstream, and merge my annotations for various kernel features that
> > break a generic distro bootup?
> >
> > Right now i have about 40 such annotations for -tip testing:
> >
> > fs/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > fs/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > security/selinux/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > security/smack/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > security/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > drivers/net/appletalk/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > drivers/net/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > drivers/media/video/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > drivers/scsi/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > drivers/watchdog/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > drivers/watchdog/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > drivers/ide/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > drivers/block/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > drivers/video/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > drivers/video/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > drivers/video/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > drivers/video/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > drivers/video/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > drivers/video/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > drivers/video/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > drivers/video/console/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > drivers/video/console/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > drivers/mtd/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > drivers/isdn/icn/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > lib/Kconfig.kgdb: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > lib/Kconfig.debug: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > lib/Kconfig.debug: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > arch/x86/Kconfig.debug: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > arch/x86/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > arch/x86/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > arch/x86/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > arch/x86/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > arch/x86/Kconfig: # depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > arch/x86/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > arch/x86/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > arch/x86/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > arch/x86/Kconfig: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > arch/x86/Kconfig.cpu: depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> >
> > and note the stark contrast to CONFIG_BROKEN - sometimes a given
> > functionality is really not meant to be enabled on a generic system.
> >
> > Ingo
> >
> > ---------------->
> > Subject: qa: no ext devt
> > From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > Date: Fri Oct 10 22:54:57 CEST 2008
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > ---
> > lib/Kconfig.debug | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > Index: linux/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux.orig/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > +++ linux/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > @@ -670,6 +670,8 @@ config DEBUG_BLOCK_EXT_DEVT
> > bool "Force extended block device numbers and spread them"
> > depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
> > depends on BLOCK
> > + depends on BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED
> > + select BROKEN_BOOT
> > default n
> > help
> > Conventionally, block device numbers are allocated from
>
> What is BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED? Honestly, I'd prefer to just put an extra
> 2-3 line paragraph in the help entry, saying that it's quite possible
> that current distros wont boot with this testing code enabled. Since
> it default to 'n', people should read the entry before turning it on
> anyway.
well, the extra BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED helps my automated test-setup to
decide whether a .config that it's testing (either sent by a reporter or
generated randomly) can be booted.
If CONFIG_BROKEN_BOOT_ALLOWED=y, then i allow config options that can
break the bootup. In that case, and _if_ such a possibly-boot-breaking
config option is enabled, CONFIG_BROKEN_BOOT is set - which my scripts
detect.
This gives the test harness the highest flexibility and annotates those
kernel features / drivers which can result in a (possibly) broken
bootup. The scripts cannot read help entries.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-11 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-10 20:30 [bug] latest -git boot hang Ingo Molnar
2008-10-10 20:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-10 20:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-10 21:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-11 0:50 ` Tejun Heo
2008-10-11 1:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-10-13 9:13 ` Tejun Heo
2008-10-13 11:07 ` [PATCH] block: add partition attribute for partition number Tejun Heo
2008-10-13 11:27 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-11 7:11 ` [bug] latest -git boot hang Jens Axboe
2008-10-11 7:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-11 14:08 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-11 14:33 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-10-11 14:39 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-11 14:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-11 17:58 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-13 6:41 ` [PATCH] block: add BIG FAT WARNING to CONFIG_DEBUG_BLOCK_EXT_DEVT Tejun Heo
2008-10-13 8:46 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-14 15:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-10-14 17:31 ` Tejun Heo
2008-10-14 15:07 ` [bug] latest -git boot hang Stephen Smalley
2008-10-14 15:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-14 15:24 ` Stephen Smalley
2008-10-15 1:48 ` Casey Schaufler
2008-10-13 8:41 ` Takashi Iwai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081011143355.GA6274@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox