[PATCH 2.6.27] x86: memtest fix use of reserve_early()

[Daniele Calore <orkaan@orkaan.org>]

Hi all,
    
Wrong usage of 2nd parameter in reserve_early call.
66/75: reserve_early(start_bad, last_bad - start_bad, "BAD RAM");
                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
The correct way is to use 'end' address and not 'size'.
As a bonus a fix to the printk format.

Signed-off-by: Daniele Calore <orkaan@orkaan.org>
    
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c b/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c
index 672e17f..9cab18b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c
@@ -61,9 +61,9 @@ static void __init memtest(unsigned long start_phys, unsigned long size,
 				last_bad += incr;
 			} else {
 				if (start_bad) {
-					printk(KERN_CONT "\n  %010lx bad mem addr %010lx - %010lx reserved",
+					printk(KERN_CONT "\n  %016lx bad mem addr %010lx - %010lx reserved",
 						val, start_bad, last_bad + incr);
-					reserve_early(start_bad, last_bad - start_bad, "BAD RAM");
+					reserve_early(start_bad, last_bad + incr, "BAD RAM");
 				}
 				start_bad = last_bad = start_phys_aligned;
 			}
@@ -72,9 +72,8 @@ static void __init memtest(unsigned long start_phys, unsigned long size,
 	if (start_bad) {
 		printk(KERN_CONT "\n  %016lx bad mem addr %010lx - %010lx reserved",
 			val, start_bad, last_bad + incr);
-		reserve_early(start_bad, last_bad - start_bad, "BAD RAM");
+		reserve_early(start_bad, last_bad + incr, "BAD RAM");
 	}
-
 }
 
 /* default is disabled */