From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net, cel <cel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] powerpc/cell/oprofile: fix mutex locking for spu-oprofile
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:53:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200810131653.29631.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200808250955.57638.arnd@arndb.de>
On Monday 25 August 2008, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 25 August 2008, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> >
> > > Since rc4 is out now, I understand if you feel more comfortable with
> > > putting the patch into -next instead of -merge.
> >
> > Linus has been getting stricter about only putting in fixes for
> > regressions and serious bugs (see his recent email to Dave Airlie on
> > LKML for instance). I assume that the corruption is just in the data
> > that is supplied to userspace and doesn't extend to any kernel data
> > structures.
>
> That's right, please queue it for -next then.
I just realized that this patch never made it into powerpc-next after
all, neither benh nor paulus version. Whoever is handling it today,
could you please pull
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arnd/cell-2.6.git merge
to get this commit below. I have rebased it on top of the current
benh/powerpc/next branch.
Thanks,
Arnd <><
---
commit aa5810fa545515c9f383e3e649bd120bef9c7f29
Author: Carl Love <cel@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri Aug 8 15:38:36 2008 -0700
powerpc/cell/oprofile: fix mutex locking for spu-oprofile
The issue is the SPU code is not holding the kernel mutex lock while
adding samples to the kernel buffer.
This patch creates per SPU buffers to hold the data. Data
is added to the buffers from in interrupt context. The data
is periodically pushed to the kernel buffer via a new Oprofile
function oprofile_put_buff(). The oprofile_put_buff() function
is called via a work queue enabling the funtion to acquire the
mutex lock.
The existing user controls for adjusting the per CPU buffer
size is used to control the size of the per SPU buffers.
Similarly, overflows of the SPU buffers are reported by
incrementing the per CPU buffer stats. This eliminates the
need to have architecture specific controls for the per SPU
buffers which is not acceptable to the OProfile user tool
maintainer.
The export of the oprofile add_event_entry() is removed as it
is no longer needed given this patch.
Note, this patch has not addressed the issue of indexing arrays
by the spu number. This still needs to be fixed as the spu
numbering is not guarenteed to be 0 to max_num_spus-1.
Signed-off-by: Carl Love <carll@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Maynard Johnson <maynardj@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Acked-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
arch/powerpc/oprofile/cell/pr_util.h | 13 +
arch/powerpc/oprofile/cell/spu_profiler.c | 4
arch/powerpc/oprofile/cell/spu_task_sync.c | 236 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
drivers/oprofile/buffer_sync.c | 24 ++
drivers/oprofile/cpu_buffer.c | 15 +
drivers/oprofile/event_buffer.c | 2
drivers/oprofile/event_buffer.h | 7
include/linux/oprofile.h | 16 +
drivers/oprofile/cpu_buffer.c | 4
9 files changed, 284 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-13 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-01 20:01 [PATCH 2/2] Cell OProfile: SPU mutex lock fix, version 4 Carl Love
2008-08-08 13:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-08 22:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] Repost " Carl Love
2008-08-09 13:13 ` please pull cell merge branch Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-10 23:17 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-08-11 7:18 ` [Cbe-oss-dev] " Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-11 7:25 ` powerpc/cell/oprofile: fix mutex locking for spu-oprofile Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-20 11:57 ` Robert Richter
2008-08-20 12:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-20 12:39 ` Robert Richter
2008-08-20 14:58 ` Carl Love
2008-08-20 12:39 ` Robert Richter
2008-08-20 13:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-21 4:21 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-08-21 8:14 ` [Cbe-oss-dev] " Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-21 10:20 ` Michael Ellerman
2008-08-21 14:58 ` Carl Love
2008-08-25 6:31 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-08-25 7:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-10-13 14:53 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2008-10-13 15:13 ` Robert Richter
2008-08-11 7:25 ` powerpc/cell/oprofile: avoid double free of profile buffer Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-19 11:53 ` Robert Richter
2008-08-11 15:34 ` [Cbe-oss-dev] please pull cell merge branch Carl Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200810131653.29631.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=cel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox