public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, ying.huang@intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm -v5] Separate atomic_t declaration from asm/atomic.h into asm/atomic_def.h
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:11:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081015151119.493ea13f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081014184718.GG15064@parisc-linux.org>

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:47:19 -0600
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 03:54:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > I have a note here that Matthew has proposed a different way of doing
> > all this.  I don't immediately recall the details.
> > 
> > Can we get a refresh on all of that please?
> 
> I didn't remember either, but having just reviewed my inbox from August,
> I said that all architectures basically use:
> 
> typedef struct { volatile int counter; } atomic_t;
> #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> typedef struct { volatile long counter; } atomic64_t;
> #endif
> 
> and that should just be put in <linux/atomic_types.h>.
> 
> Roman Zippel did me one better and suggested just putting it in types.h,
> which works for me.

OK.  Or we could do the usual include/asm-generic/atomic_types.h and
then architectures can choose to include that if it is appropriate.

Anyway the good news is that this concept is an addition to rather than
a replacement of this current patch.


  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-15 22:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-08  9:44 [PATCH -mm -v5] Separate atomic_t declaration from asm/atomic.h into asm/atomic_def.h Huang Ying
2008-10-10 21:43 ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-10 21:49   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-10 22:54     ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-14 18:47       ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-10-15 22:11         ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-10-15 22:19           ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-10-15 22:31             ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-18  4:00               ` Matthew Wilcox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081015151119.493ea13f.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox