From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, ying.huang@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm -v5] Separate atomic_t declaration from asm/atomic.h into asm/atomic_def.h
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:31:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081015153124.c560e97e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081015221947.GN15064@parisc-linux.org>
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:19:48 -0600
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 03:11:19PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:47:19 -0600
> > Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> wrote:
> > > Roman Zippel did me one better and suggested just putting it in types.h,
> > > which works for me.
> >
> > OK. Or we could do the usual include/asm-generic/atomic_types.h and
> > then architectures can choose to include that if it is appropriate.
> >
> > Anyway the good news is that this concept is an addition to rather than
> > a replacement of this current patch.
>
> Um, no. Roman and I are against the creation of a new file. Just put
> the atomic_t definition in <linux/types.h>.
Well we've been glacially fartarsing around with this for sufficiently
long that any such alterations will be too late for 2.6.28.
I'll drop it all. Again.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-15 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-08 9:44 [PATCH -mm -v5] Separate atomic_t declaration from asm/atomic.h into asm/atomic_def.h Huang Ying
2008-10-10 21:43 ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-10 21:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-10 22:54 ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-14 18:47 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-10-15 22:11 ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-15 22:19 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-10-15 22:31 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-10-18 4:00 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081015153124.c560e97e.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox