Re: [RFC] Kernel version numbering scheme change

markus reichelt
2008-10-16T14:56:33Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 558 bytes --]

* Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:

> So, as someone who constantly is dealing with kernel version
> numbers all the time with the -stable trees, our current numbering
> scheme is a pain a times. How about this proposal instead?

Why not just keep it? It has worked so far, and from a strictly
end-user point of view I cannot see any advantages at all with a new
scheme. The ideas mentioned so far don't cut it either.

Just my heretic 2 cents,
S.

PS: Nice timing, thunderstorm approaching.

--
In Russia, President kills Financial Crisis

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]