From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758204AbYJPTxb (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:53:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758066AbYJPTw7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:52:59 -0400 Received: from mail-gx0-f16.google.com ([209.85.217.16]:61815 "EHLO mail-gx0-f16.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758028AbYJPTw6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:52:58 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:message-id; b=jeo+KFOkHLrFSLG7S6pJofrLvTtBLEAJF77z0WyOVJKbvN6eqfgHXSJKWVqWQFVFjg d9FmOExMCNp8Eb9evwY6qHe1HlyQzNFKg0L5M8OvZNDIXBc/80aJa+Itr8kQGmbN+69n B5H8fD+kxYXJk+H/u20GJsf5hjIoAZ27wi+qo= From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: petkovbb@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] ide-cd: remove obsolete seek optimization Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:41:25 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200810152147.47534.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20081016054238.GB32756@gollum.tnic> In-Reply-To: <20081016054238.GB32756@gollum.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810162141.25832.bzolnier@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 16 October 2008, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 09:47:47PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > It doesn't make much sense nowadays and is problematic on some drives. > > This is a big chunk, after all. We should do more hammering on it though, just > to be sure. yep, this is meant for .29