From: Max Kellermann <mk@cm4all.com>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ijc@hellion.org.uk,
Grant Coady <grant_lkml@dodo.com.au>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Tom Tucker <tom@opengridcomputing.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFS regression in 2.6.26?, "task blocked for more than 120 seconds"
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:51:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081020065149.GA11213@rabbit.intern.cm-ag> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081017143301.GA18522@poweredge.glommer>
On 2008/10/17 16:33, Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com> wrote:
> That's probably something related to apic congestion.
> Does the problem go away if the only thing you change is this:
>
>
> > @@ -891,11 +897,6 @@ do_rest:
> > store_NMI_vector(&nmi_high, &nmi_low);
> >
> > smpboot_setup_warm_reset_vector(start_ip);
> > - /*
> > - * Be paranoid about clearing APIC errors.
> > - */
> > - apic_write(APIC_ESR, 0);
> > - apic_read(APIC_ESR);
> > }
>
>
> Please let me know.
Hello Glauber,
I have rebooted the server with 2.6.27.1 + this patchlet an hour ago.
No problems since.
Hardware: Compaq P4 Xeon server, Broadcom CMIC-WS / CIOB-X2 board.
Tell me if you need more detailed information.
On 2008/10/20 08:27, Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk> wrote:
> The issue I see still occurs well before those changesets. I have
> seen it with v2.6.25 but v2.6.24 survived for 7 days without issue
> (my threshold for a good kernel is 7 days, hence bisecting is a bit
> slow...).
Hello Ian,
it seems we're hunting down different bugs after all. Too bad, I
hoped I could have solved your problem, too. Our machine has been
running well over the weekend with the patch I posted; with faulty
kernels, the problem would occur after a few minutes.
Max
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-20 6:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-17 12:32 [PATCH] NFS regression in 2.6.26?, "task blocked for more than 120 seconds" Max Kellermann
2008-10-17 14:33 ` Glauber Costa
2008-10-20 6:51 ` Max Kellermann [this message]
2008-10-20 7:43 ` Ian Campbell
2008-10-20 13:15 ` Glauber Costa
2008-10-20 14:12 ` Max Kellermann
2008-10-20 14:34 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-10-20 14:21 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-05-22 20:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-25 13:12 ` Max Kellermann
2008-10-20 6:27 ` Ian Campbell
2008-11-01 11:45 ` Ian Campbell
2008-11-01 13:41 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-11-02 14:40 ` Ian Campbell
2008-11-07 2:12 ` kenneth johansson
2008-11-04 19:10 ` Ian Campbell
2008-11-25 7:09 ` Ian Campbell
2008-11-25 13:28 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-11-25 13:38 ` Ian Campbell
2008-11-25 13:57 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-11-25 14:04 ` Ian Campbell
2008-11-26 22:12 ` Ian Campbell
2008-12-01 0:17 ` [PATCH 0/3] " Trond Myklebust
2008-12-01 0:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] SUNRPC: Ensure the server closes sockets in a timely fashion Trond Myklebust
2008-12-17 15:27 ` Tom Tucker
2008-12-17 18:08 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-12-17 18:59 ` Tom Tucker
2008-12-01 0:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] SUNRPC: We only need to call svc_delete_xprt() once Trond Myklebust
2008-12-01 0:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] SUNRPC: svc_xprt_enqueue should not refuse to enqueue 'XPT_DEAD' transports Trond Myklebust
2008-12-17 15:35 ` Tom Tucker
2008-12-17 19:07 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-12-23 14:49 ` Tom Tucker
2008-12-23 23:39 ` Tom Tucker
2008-12-01 0:29 ` [PATCH 0/3] NFS regression in 2.6.26?, "task blocked for more than 120 seconds" Trond Myklebust
2008-12-02 15:22 ` Kasparek Tomas
2008-12-02 15:37 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-12-02 16:26 ` Kasparek Tomas
2008-12-02 18:10 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-12-01 22:09 ` Ian Campbell
2008-12-06 12:16 ` Ian Campbell
2008-12-14 18:24 ` Ian Campbell
2008-12-16 17:55 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-12-16 18:39 ` Ian Campbell
2009-01-07 22:21 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-08 18:20 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-08 21:22 ` Ian Campbell
2009-01-08 21:26 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-12 9:46 ` Ian Campbell
2009-01-22 8:27 ` Ian Campbell
2009-01-22 16:44 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081020065149.GA11213@rabbit.intern.cm-ag \
--to=mk@cm4all.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=glommer@redhat.com \
--cc=grant_lkml@dodo.com.au \
--cc=ijc@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom@opengridcomputing.com \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox