Re: [PATCH] byteorder: remove direct includes of linux/byteorder/swab[b].h

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:23:38 -0700
Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> wrote:

> A consolidated implementation will provide this generically through
> asm/byteorder, remove direct includes to avoid breakage when the
> changeover to the new implementation occurs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
> ---
> Andrew, this hunk seems to have been lost when you sent it to Linus, it's possible
> you applied this on top of the -next tree where this file has moved, but the tests
> tree hasn't been pulled yet.
> 
> The rest of the patch went into mainline as 1d8cca44b6a244b7e378546d719041819049a0f9
> 

Grump.  It happens sometimes.  People putting stuff into linux-next and
then not merging it into the next kernel.

> 
>  kernel/rcutorture.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcutorture.c
> index 90b5b12..85cb905 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutorture.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutorture.c
> @@ -42,10 +42,10 @@
>  #include <linux/freezer.h>
>  #include <linux/cpu.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
> -#include <linux/byteorder/swabb.h>
>  #include <linux/stat.h>
>  #include <linux/srcu.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <asm/byteorder.h>

Should this be linux/byteorder.h?  (Which weirdly doesn't include
asm/byteorder.h).