From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] pending scheduler updates
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 23:05:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081021173529.GG11679@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081020120538.GD10594@elte.hu>
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 02:05:38PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
>
> > Please apply
>
> applied these to tip/sched/urgent:
>
> f9c0b09: sched: revert back to per-rq vruntime
> a4c2f00: sched: fair scheduler should not resched rt tasks
> ffda12a: sched: optimize group load balancer
>
> (will wait with 4/4 until you and Mike come to a verdict.)
Is there any conclusion on Patch 4/4? It looks sane to me!
--
Regards,
vatsa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-21 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-17 17:27 [PATCH 0/4] pending scheduler updates Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-17 17:27 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched: optimize group load balancer Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-17 17:27 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched: fair scheduler should not resched rt tasks Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-17 17:27 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched: revert back to per-rq vruntime Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-17 17:27 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched: fix wakeup preemption Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-20 21:57 ` Chris Friesen
2008-10-20 12:05 ` [PATCH 0/4] pending scheduler updates Ingo Molnar
2008-10-21 17:35 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri [this message]
2008-10-22 9:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-22 10:03 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-10-22 10:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-10-22 12:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-22 12:38 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-10-22 12:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-22 13:05 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-10-22 17:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-22 17:56 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081021173529.GG11679@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox