From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758132AbYJVSvq (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:51:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752016AbYJVSvd (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:51:33 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:34718 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751654AbYJVSvd (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:51:33 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:48:08 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Len Brown Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hiroshi Miura , YOKOTA Hiroshi Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/42] Staging: add pcc-acpi driver Message-ID: <20081022184808.GA24150@suse.de> References: <20081022172203.GA4000@kroah.com> <1224696563-5170-1-git-send-email-gregkh@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 02:37:18PM -0400, Len Brown wrote: > NAK. > this was already relplaced by the panasonic driver in the acpi tree. Is this in 2.6.27, or was it a 2.6.28 addition? For some reason, I had reports from openSUSE users that 2.6.27 still didn't work properly and needed this driver. How about the new "pcc-acpi-cdrom" driver hack? Hiroshi, is that needed still with the 2.6.27 kernel? > Greg, > If it has the word "acpi" in it, please check with me before > putting something in the staging tree, for I'd prefer to > stage such things in the acpi tree. Ok, I didn't know you wanted "uncleaned" drivers in your tree, I'll remember this for the future :) thanks, greg k-h