From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, travis@sgi.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: do_boot_cpu can deadlock?
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:49:06 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081023184906.GA2612@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081023182119.GA1480@in.ibm.com>
[Gautham R Shenoy - Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:51:19PM +0530]
| On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 07:02:12PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
| > Hmm. arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c:do_boot_cpu() can deadlock ?
| >
| > It is called from _cpu_up() under cpu_hotplug_begin(), and it
| > waits for c_idle.work. Again, if we have the pending work which
| > needs get_online_cpus() we seem to have problems.
|
| Good point. Though this code gets triggered mostly during boot time when
| the CPUs are being brought online for the first time. If we have some
| work-item pending at that time, which needs get_online_cpus(), we could
| possibly see this deadlock.
|
| >
| > Oleg.
|
| --
| Thanks and Regards
| gautham
|
May I ask? If I understand right we do use this part of do_boot_cpu
if (!keventd_up() || current_is_keventd())
c_idle.work.func(&c_idle.work);
else {
schedule_work(&c_idle.work);
wait_for_completion(&c_idle.done);
}
if only we've been called the first time after power on. And all
subsequent call of this do_boot_cpu would lead to
if (c_idle.idle) {
c_idle.idle->thread.sp = (unsigned long) (((struct pt_regs *)
(THREAD_SIZE + task_stack_page(c_idle.idle))) - 1);
init_idle(c_idle.idle, cpu);
goto do_rest;
}
ie go to do_rest and no wait_for_completion/schedule_work at all.
Did I miss something? *Sorry* in advance if the question is quite
not related. This work-pending situation is in 'possible' scenario
only (ie we don't have such a callers for now... yet)?
- Cyrill -
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-23 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-23 16:55 [PATCH 1/7] work_on_cpu: helper for doing task on a CPU Rusty Russell
2008-10-23 7:22 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-10-23 9:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-10-23 14:36 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-10-23 16:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-10-23 17:02 ` do_boot_cpu can deadlock? Oleg Nesterov
2008-10-23 18:21 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-10-23 18:49 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2008-10-24 9:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-10-24 9:53 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-10-24 10:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-10-24 3:04 ` [PATCH 1/7] work_on_cpu: helper for doing task on a CPU Rusty Russell
2008-10-24 7:21 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-10-24 10:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-10-24 11:18 ` Rusty Russell
2008-10-24 11:40 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-10-24 13:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-10-24 13:41 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-10-24 14:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-10-23 15:10 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081023184906.GA2612@localhost \
--to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox