public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "npiggin@suse.de" <npiggin@suse.de>,
	"hugh@veritas.com" <hugh@veritas.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] remap_pfn_range: store vm_pgoff for all linear_over_vma_region mappings
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:43:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081023224343.GA28072@linux-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081023220913.GA20300@linux-os.sc.intel.com>


[Sorry for the duplicate. Correctly sending to Andrew this time.]

On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 03:09:14PM -0700, Venki Pallipadi wrote:
> 
> While working on x86 PAT, we are having some hurdles with tracking
> remap_pfn_range() regions, as later we do not have any information to say
> whether that PFNMAP mapping is linear for the entire vma range or
> it is smaller granularity regions within the vma.
> 
> A simple solution to this is to use vm_pgoff as an indicator for
> linear mapping over the vma region. Currently, remap_pfn_range
> only sets vm_pgoff only for COW mappings. Below patch changes the
> logic and sets the vm_pgoff irrespective of COW.
> 
> From our understanding of the code, this should not break anyone.
> Just sending it as an RFC to get feedback on whether it is OK to do
> something like this or are there any corner cases that we may
> break or watch out for.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
> 
> ---
>  mm/memory.c |    7 +++----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/mm/memory.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/memory.c	2008-10-21 09:58:47.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6/mm/memory.c	2008-10-23 13:38:26.000000000 -0700
> @@ -1575,11 +1575,10 @@ int remap_pfn_range(struct vm_area_struc
>  	 * behaviour that some programs depend on. We mark the "original"
>  	 * un-COW'ed pages by matching them up with "vma->vm_pgoff".
>  	 */
> -	if (is_cow_mapping(vma->vm_flags)) {
> -		if (addr != vma->vm_start || end != vma->vm_end)
> -			return -EINVAL;
> +	if (addr == vma->vm_start && end == vma->vm_end)
>  		vma->vm_pgoff = pfn;
> -	}
> +	else if (is_cow_mapping(vma->vm_flags))
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	vma->vm_flags |= VM_IO | VM_RESERVED | VM_PFNMAP;
>  

  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-23 22:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-23 22:09 [RFC] remap_pfn_range: store vm_pgoff for all linear_over_vma_region mappings Venki Pallipadi
2008-10-23 22:43 ` Venki Pallipadi [this message]
2008-10-24  1:08 ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-24  4:13   ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081023224343.GA28072@linux-os.sc.intel.com \
    --to=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox