From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756541AbYJWPBZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:01:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752514AbYJWPBO (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:01:14 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:32977 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756226AbYJWPBN (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:01:13 -0400 From: Rusty Russell To: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [bug #2] Re: [PATCH 00/35] cpumask: Replace cpumask_t with struct cpumask Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 02:01:14 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: Mike Travis , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20081023020826.051012000@polaris-admin.engr.sgi.com> <20081023125529.GA18327@elte.hu> <20081023142025.GA18804@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20081023142025.GA18804@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810240201.15037.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 24 October 2008 01:20:25 Ingo Molnar wrote: > Thomas has started a -tip cross-build test, and there's massive > cross-build failures as well due to the cpumask changes: Yes. linux-next reported the same thing. I've backed out various arch changes for this reason. > it seems to me that this commit is massively borked: > > 4a792c2: cpumask: make CONFIG_NR_CPUS always valid Yep. This is the big one I dropped. There are a few others; Mike is just porting the changes across to your tree now. Cheers, Rusty.