public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, travis@sgi.com,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Vitaly Mayatskikh <vmayatsk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: do_boot_cpu can deadlock?
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:51:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081024105132.GA8442@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081024095336.GA17679@in.ibm.com>

On 10/24, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:33:42AM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> > But let's suppose we boot with maxcpus=1, and then bring up another CPU.
> > Or we really add the new physical CPU (I don't really know if this is
> > possible on x86).
>
> Even I am not sure if physical hotplug is possible.
>
> But think about the virtualization case when we want to add
> additional CPU to a KVM guest at runtime? This
> is not such a rare use-case. It could dead-lock that time, No?

virtualization/KVM is a black magic to me ;) I don't know how/if it is
possible to add CPU at runtime.

Anyway, booting with maxcpus=1 allows us to bring up another CPU later,
and idle_thread_array[cpu] == NULL in that case, yes?

Perhaps smp_prepare_cpus() can do fork_idle() for_each_possible_cpu() ?
Or we can change do_boot_cpu() to use kthread_run() to create the idle
thread.

Oleg.


  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-24 10:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-23 16:55 [PATCH 1/7] work_on_cpu: helper for doing task on a CPU Rusty Russell
2008-10-23  7:22 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-10-23  9:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-10-23 14:36   ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-10-23 16:35     ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-10-23 17:02       ` do_boot_cpu can deadlock? Oleg Nesterov
2008-10-23 18:21         ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-10-23 18:49           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-10-24  9:33             ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-10-24  9:53               ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-10-24 10:51                 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2008-10-24  3:04     ` [PATCH 1/7] work_on_cpu: helper for doing task on a CPU Rusty Russell
2008-10-24  7:21       ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-10-24 10:29         ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-10-24 11:18           ` Rusty Russell
2008-10-24 11:40           ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-10-24 13:25             ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-10-24 13:41               ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-10-24 14:23                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-10-23 15:10   ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081024105132.GA8442@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=travis@sgi.com \
    --cc=vmayatsk@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox