From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752153AbYJYNWV (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Oct 2008 09:22:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751419AbYJYNWK (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Oct 2008 09:22:10 -0400 Received: from gv-out-0910.google.com ([216.239.58.187]:62561 "EHLO gv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751362AbYJYNWI (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Oct 2008 09:22:08 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:message-id; b=FHAgrwkXufhS2cuYzm3A8YiP6cWtALClX1RUgpywgyQYmzbmrYvZQmxecCOMeaLBGW IizlFMcnTUCaHGXK3sKcmaAIBqlyI+kWu+Gp3vE89RUnEMPeydlMMhS/Clqxnowya9AB Nw5L8a0DNPma1Ks1UNlHPatdZZzBMjwXen2Tw= From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: benh@kernel.crashing.org Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 24 - powerpc - build failure with !CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PMAC Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:19:57 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: Sergei Shtylyov , Kamalesh Babulal , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org References: <20081024171932.1e8131d0.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <49024EA3.1080404@ru.mvista.com> <1224889818.7654.466.camel@pasglop> In-Reply-To: <1224889818.7654.466.camel@pasglop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810251519.57543.bzolnier@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 25 October 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 02:39 +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > > >> Hm, looks like this configuration was never buildable -- > > #ifdef's are > > >> missing and wrongly placed. CCing Ben Herrenschmidt... > > >> > > > > > > What configuration ? > > > > > > > See the subject. > > Ah ok. We should probably just remove the option... Fine with me. Anybody want an easy +1 patch-point? :)