From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751801AbYJYThP (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:37:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751066AbYJYTg6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:36:58 -0400 Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.134.189]:34192 "EHLO mu-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750928AbYJYTg4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:36:56 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:message-id; b=DGjbjE/cgQgwmdOosbsPuZDIjCDiZAiC4gVaJ+P0M4hOtf3Benfl1TgdlClMzOl7s7 5wGHc3aMx3MnwN7Fmp+oCf65kn96FwZUzd8MNgd8yGWYP9c3l8M8uZGILxCEP2+V3IKI gOu7BYHKl2Bo6/xFqiQgktq6raVnBwEUozbe0= From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 24 - powerpc - build failure with !CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PMAC Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 21:35:15 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, Kamalesh Babulal , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org References: <20081024171932.1e8131d0.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <200810251519.57543.bzolnier@gmail.com> <49036C17.1060604@ru.mvista.com> In-Reply-To: <49036C17.1060604@ru.mvista.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810252135.16056.bzolnier@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 25 October 2008, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > >>>>> Hm, looks like this configuration was never buildable -- #ifdef's are missing and wrongly placed. CCing Ben Herrenschmidt... > >>>>> > >>>> What configuration ? > >>>> > >>>> > >>> See the subject. > >>> > >> Ah ok. We should probably just remove the option... > >> > > > > Fine with me. Anybody want an easy +1 patch-point? :) > > > > BTW, why this option selects BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI? Leftover from the dark-ages... needs fixing.