From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: "Zhao, Yu" <yu.zhao@intel.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@uniscape.net>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"greg@kroah.com" <greg@kroah.com>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@kernel.org" <stable@kernel.org>,
Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: Fixing drivers/pci/search.c compilation warning.
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 01:07:45 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081027070745.GY26094@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49053313.9080706@intel.com>
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:18:43AM +0800, Zhao, Yu wrote:
> Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >Yes, that's why pci_find_device() is deprecated. But it doesn't also
> >need to be buggy ;-)
>
> How about pci_get_bus_and_slot()? People would meet the problem with it
> anyway.
What problem with it? It's documented to return the device with an
increased refcount, and the implementation appears to do exactly that:
struct pci_dev * pci_get_bus_and_slot(unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn)
{
struct pci_dev *dev = NULL;
while ((dev = pci_get_device(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, dev)) != NULL) {
if (pci_domain_nr(dev->bus) == 0 &&
(dev->bus->number == bus && dev->devfn == devfn))
return dev;
}
return NULL;
}
Are you saying some users of it neglect to decrement the refcount before
disposing of the device?
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-27 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <b9df5fa10809280816u23ef3021k7eee287a237b72ae@mail.gmail.com>
2008-09-28 16:32 ` [PATCH] pci: Fixing drivers/pci/search.c compilation warning Matthew Wilcox
2008-10-21 1:13 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-10-21 1:29 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-10-21 17:24 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-10-26 12:51 ` Yu Zhao
2008-10-26 18:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-10-27 3:18 ` Zhao, Yu
2008-10-27 7:07 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2008-10-27 7:13 ` Zhao, Yu
2008-10-27 7:21 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-10-27 7:34 ` Zhao, Yu
2008-10-27 7:43 ` Zhao, Yu
2008-10-27 7:45 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081027070745.GY26094@parisc-linux.org \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rakib.mullick@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=yu.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=yu.zhao@uniscape.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox