public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>,
	Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip/cpus4096-v2] cpumask: fix cpumask of call_function_data
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:59:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081027125904.GA24347@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081027125512.GD12461@elte.hu>


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

> 
> * Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> 
> > On Friday 24 October 2008 15:47:20 Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
> > > From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>
> > 
> > Ingo, because of these concerns I recommend you revert 
> > d4de5ac3b5e70928c86e3e5ac311f16cbf2e9ab3 (cpumask: 
> > smp_call_function_many()) for now, and apply this less contentious 
> > version.
> 
> ok - applied it to tip/cpus4096-v2, thanks Rusty!
> 
> If there's any chance for this in v2.6.28 then only if we disable 
> the dynamic API branch altogether [CONFIG_MAXCPUS] and keep that for 
> v2.6.29. This means we'd bring in the API changes which should have 
> trivial impact only - and none of the riskier changes.

in any case, i've started testing tip/cpus4096-v2 again on x86 - the 
problem with d4de5a above was the only outstanding known issue, right?

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-27 12:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-24  4:47 [PATCH -tip/cpus4096-v2] cpumask: fix cpumask of call_function_data Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-10-24 11:05 ` Rusty Russell
2008-10-24 21:46   ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-10-26 22:40     ` Rusty Russell
2008-10-30 17:44       ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-10-24 11:15 ` Rusty Russell
2008-10-27 12:55   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-27 12:59     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-10-27 13:02       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-27 13:32       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-27 23:07         ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-10-28  0:46           ` Rusty Russell
2008-10-27 22:21     ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081027125904.GA24347@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=travis@sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox