From: "Andries E. Brouwer" <Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl>
To: mtk.manpages@gmail.com
Cc: Daniel Gollub <dgollub@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
linux-man@vger.kernel.org, ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net,
"A.E. Brouwer" <aeb@win.tue.nl>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] [RFC] kernel/glibc mismatch of "readlink" syscall?
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:11:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081027204509.GA27111@ub> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cfd18e0f0810241553x77194611o11655a89871dc210@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 05:53:25PM -0500, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Daniel Gollub <dgollub@suse.de> wrote:
>>
>> found something which looks for me like a kernel/glibc syscall mismatch.
>>
>> The standard and the manpages and glibc have
>> ssize_t readlink(..., size_t bufsize);
>>
>> But the kernel has
>>
>> linux-2.6/include/linux/syscalls.h:
>> asmlinkage long sys_readlink(..., int bufsiz);
>>
>> All readlink prototypes, expect the one in the kernel, have an unsigned
>> buffer size.
>
> I agree; the inconsistency is strange.
Hmm. I am inclined not to agree. There is no reason to expect
any particular relation between the kernel prototype of sys_foo
(if such a function exists)
and the user space prototype of the foo() C-library function.
The POSIX standard, man-pages, libc include files document the
userspace / libc interface, not the system call interface.
The system call interface is mostly undocumented.
The kernel prototype is chosen for kernel-internal or historical reasons.
Andries
sys_ppc32.c:
/* Note: it is necessary to treat bufsiz as an unsigned int ... */
asmlinkage long compat_sys_readlink(..., u32 bufsiz)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-28 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-23 14:50 [patch 0/3] [RFC] kernel/glibc mismatch of "readlink" syscall? Daniel Gollub
2008-10-23 14:50 ` [patch 1/3] [RFC] Change sys_readlink/sys_readlinkat buffer size parameter to size_t (POSIX mismatch) Daniel Gollub
2008-10-23 14:50 ` [patch 2/3] [man-pages] Remove "bufsize is not positive" from readlink(2) error section Daniel Gollub
2008-10-23 14:50 ` [patch 3/3] [ltp] Remove testcase for "Buffer size is not positive" in kernel/syscalls/readlink/readlink03 Daniel Gollub
2008-10-24 22:53 ` [patch 0/3] [RFC] kernel/glibc mismatch of "readlink" syscall? Michael Kerrisk
2008-10-28 9:11 ` Andries E. Brouwer [this message]
2008-10-31 15:02 ` Kai Henningsen
2008-10-31 15:37 ` Daniel Gollub
2008-11-04 16:20 ` Michael Kerrisk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081027204509.GA27111@ub \
--to=andries.brouwer@cwi.nl \
--cc=aeb@win.tue.nl \
--cc=dgollub@suse.de \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox