From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
acme@ghostprotocols.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] headers: move release_kernel_lock(), reacquire_kernel_lock() to sched.c
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 07:18:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081029061827.GA7936@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081029044447.GB2304@x200.localdomain>
* Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> wrote:
> >From 21b76c6e7d2340805664b91dc1c83eb23c6f785d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:57:28 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] headers: move release_kernel_lock(), reacquire_kernel_lock() to sched.c
>
> Both are used only by scheduler, both are low-level enough to not allow in
> drivers. Removal allows to remove sched.h from smp_lock.h, which is needed
> solely for inline function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/linux/smp_lock.h | 18 ------------------
> kernel/sched.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/smp_lock.h b/include/linux/smp_lock.h
> index 813be59..6052f02 100644
> --- a/include/linux/smp_lock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/smp_lock.h
> @@ -8,22 +8,6 @@
>
> extern int __lockfunc __reacquire_kernel_lock(void);
> extern void __lockfunc __release_kernel_lock(void);
> -
> -/*
> - * Release/re-acquire global kernel lock for the scheduler
> - */
> -#define release_kernel_lock(tsk) do { \
> - if (unlikely((tsk)->lock_depth >= 0)) \
> - __release_kernel_lock(); \
> -} while (0)
> -
> -static inline int reacquire_kernel_lock(struct task_struct *task)
> -{
> - if (unlikely(task->lock_depth >= 0))
> - return __reacquire_kernel_lock();
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> extern void __lockfunc lock_kernel(void) __acquires(kernel_lock);
> extern void __lockfunc unlock_kernel(void) __releases(kernel_lock);
>
> @@ -43,9 +27,7 @@ static inline void cycle_kernel_lock(void)
>
> #define lock_kernel() do { } while(0)
> #define unlock_kernel() do { } while(0)
> -#define release_kernel_lock(task) do { } while(0)
> #define cycle_kernel_lock() do { } while(0)
> -#define reacquire_kernel_lock(task) 0
> #define kernel_locked() 1
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_LOCK_KERNEL */
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index 6625c3c..96a4462 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -79,6 +79,26 @@
>
> #include "sched_cpupri.h"
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCK_KERNEL
> +/*
> + * Release/re-acquire global kernel lock for the scheduler
> + */
> +#define release_kernel_lock(tsk) do { \
> + if (unlikely((tsk)->lock_depth >= 0)) \
> + __release_kernel_lock(); \
> +} while (0)
> +
> +static inline int reacquire_kernel_lock(struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> + if (unlikely(task->lock_depth >= 0))
> + return __reacquire_kernel_lock();
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#else
> +#define release_kernel_lock(task) do { } while(0)
> +#define reacquire_kernel_lock(task) 0
> +#endif
please dont move #ifdefs and interfaces into a .c file - if then move
it into another header file.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-29 6:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-29 4:43 [GIT] headers redux Alexey Dobriyan
2008-10-29 4:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] headers: move release_kernel_lock(), reacquire_kernel_lock() to sched.c Alexey Dobriyan
2008-10-29 4:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] headers: reduction in interrupt.h Alexey Dobriyan
2008-10-29 6:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-29 6:18 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-10-29 6:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] headers: move release_kernel_lock(), reacquire_kernel_lock() to sched.c Harvey Harrison
2008-10-29 10:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-10-29 13:14 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-10-29 16:42 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081029061827.GA7936@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox