From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: jeremy@goop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: replace BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY with BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:27:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081029092733.GS22217@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081029080603J.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
On Wed, Oct 29 2008, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:57:00 +0100
> Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 27 2008, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > > Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > >Pretty much baffles me as well, xen should just need to do
> > > >
> > > >#define BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE(vec1, vec2) 0
> > > >
> > >
> > > It needs to be a runtime switch, since we only want to do this when
> > > actually running under Xen. Also, its possible that the two pages might
> > > actually be physically contiguous, so they could be merged anyway.
> >
> > Alright, then add a xen_biovec_phys_mergeable(vec1, vec2) in the xen
> > code that actually checks this for real. You can add your switch there
> > as well. Then put the BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE() in the xen arch includes,
> > done.
> >
> > What Tomo is saying is that this has nothing to do with virtual merging,
> > and he's right.
>
> Yeah, overriding BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE perfectly works for Xen. And it
> is not related with BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY at all.
>
> Ingo, please put this patch into your tree:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122482703716620&w=2
You can add my Signed-off-by: as well.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-29 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-24 5:41 [PATCH] x86: remove dead BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY definition FUJITA Tomonori
2008-10-24 20:58 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-10-27 4:42 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-10-24 20:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] bio: define __BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-10-24 20:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: replace BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY with BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-10-27 3:52 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-10-27 8:21 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-10-27 8:37 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-10-27 9:18 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-10-27 9:36 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-10-27 9:41 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-27 11:43 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-10-27 11:57 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-28 23:06 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-10-29 8:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-29 9:24 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-10-29 10:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-29 11:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-29 11:27 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-29 11:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-29 11:34 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-29 11:55 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-10-29 12:12 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-10-29 13:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-29 13:06 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-10-29 13:06 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-29 9:27 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081029092733.GS22217@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).